RightScale MultiCloud Platform vs vRealize Automation

RightScale MultiCloud Platform is ranked 13th in Cloud Management with 3 reviews vs vRealize Automation which is ranked 5th in Cloud Management with 67 reviews. The top reviewer of RightScale MultiCloud Platform writes "We now have the ability to provision an entire Data Center and Application stack in less than an hour". The top reviewer of vRealize Automation writes "Enables us to flex up or flex down the environment quickly; makes our DevOps processes more consistent". RightScale MultiCloud Platform is most compared with Scalr, Cisco CloudCenter and VMware vRealize Suite. vRealize Automation is most compared with vCloud Director, Red Hat CloudForms and vCenter Orchestrator. See our RightScale MultiCloud Platform vs vRealize Automation report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RightScale MultiCloud Platform vs vRealize Automation and others in Cloud Management.
291,379 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing RightScale MultiCloud Platform vs vRealize Automation

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The forecasting is handy to view.The security port maps are impressive.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is the consistency it delivers, at the end of the day. We know that we have consistent images based off consistent Blueprints, check-pointed or QA'ed in a consistent manner.With the advent of the automation, we've been able to give DevOps the ability to spin up environments, give them lease times, and then have it automatically reclaim the environment.The most valued feature is the streamlining of the DevOps process, automation and orchestration. It provides the ability for the entire Dev lifecycle to actually be incorporated into a single stream.We are able to provide self-service to all of our IT/development teams to expand and decrease their environments at will.value; It has provided my development team a pure self-service portal. We deploy thousands of machines and reclaim. So, their time to business, and their time to market has been ´╗┐improved exponentially.The most valuable features are the metrics and reporting aspects. The historical data and extraction enable us to tell where the trends are and where contentions may exist in the future.Today, if I want to provision one VM, it takes me five minutes. Earlier, it would take a minimum of 30 minutes to go and choose everything. Now, I can just do one click and it can provision my whole VM. We also integrated with our Alexa, so even through voice functionality, I can create a VM. One of the guys at VMware, along with our partner, deployed that in our environment. If I say, "Hey, Alexa, I need a VM with four gigs of RAM," it will go and start creating it.The most valuable feature is, instead of doing the VMotion manually, we have automated everything with a script, using vRealize. That means I don't need to think about things like compatibility. The system will do everything for me and just give me a report.

Read more »

Cons
Deployment is too complex and time consuming. It has delivered no real value beyond the automation of VM deployment.

Read more »

It is not super-intuitive. It does require some skills to understand how to use it. I had no problem, but I had spent a lot of time already learning this product ahead of moving it to an operational status. But as we did so, we had a hard time bringing some people from other groups into the fold, to script and work against this environment. So, the ability to build workflows within that automation needs to be streamlined.In terms of additional features, I would like it to be able to poll my vCenter infrastructure more rapidly and adapt to changes quickly. It should alert me and let me know when there are broken components, as a result of underlying infrastructure changes. It needs to be more stringent.We still struggle a little bit with the configuration as far as making sure that we have all the endpoints where they need to be, because that's not as agile as we'd like in the back-end. We're working towards that with our DevOps teams to make sure that we're touching the right endpoints and getting the right data.in general, it took us a long time to get it off the ground. We had a lot of issues upfront and we determined that we just needed to scrap it. I think we scrapped it two or three times before we actually got it built the way we wanted, and we're still not where we need to be. We have had downtime. There have been some issues, but we're also two iterations behind on version.The initial setup was not straightforward. It was not simple, and we had a PoC. We had VMware help us deploy it, and it took them an exorbitant amount of time.It would be nice if, at the director level, the manager level, there was a pretty graphic. They don't like to see numbers and line items, they want to see graphs and scales and real world pictures. That would support better reporting.It is not intuitive or user-friendly. It's complicated as heck. We actually hired VMware Professional Services to come in. I understand the newer version, which we're not quite on yet, is easier and that the interface is better. But the product is really a profession unto itself. The user interface could be improved on.In terms of usability, It has had its challenges. It requires a lot of custom code to integrate into our environment. It can take a little while to get it to do what we want, takes some code instead of having built-in functionality. Part it is how we use it. It would be a lot easier to use in a greenfield scenario versus brownfield, which is the way we using it.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Due to its implementation's complexity, it was delivered for a minimal value at a high cost.It is expensive.

Read more »

The solution has helped to increase infrastructure, agility, speed, and provisioning in the time to market.We have seen significant ROI. We used to have physical servers, it took 90 days to get a server, order it, buy it, and get it in. We have it down to 10 minutes, building a server with virtualization, and now that's too slow. So, we let the customer do it at their speed. Therefore, it is pretty much up in a couple of minutes and they have a server.Better pricing is always handy, but I feel it's at the right price point.I'm very interested in the integration with Puppet. However, my organization doesn't have the funding for something like Puppet right now. If VMware would integrate that feature set (Puppet) into vRA. That would be very awesome.From the customer perspective, the value was worth it.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
291,379 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
5,117
Comparisons
3,506
Reviews
3
Followers
377
Avg. Rating
6.3
Views
6,528
Comparisons
3,456
Reviews
40
Followers
375
Avg. Rating
7.9
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more RightScale MultiCloud Platform competitors ┬╗See more vRealize Automation competitors ┬╗
Also Known As
Also Known AsVMware vRealize Automation, vRA, VMware DynamicOps Cloud Suite
Website/Video
Website/VideoRightScale
VMware
Overview
Overview

With the RightScale Multi-Cloud Platform, you can mix and match public clouds, private clouds, and virtualized environments to meet your cloud portfolio strategy. In addition to clouds, you can support a portfolio of hypervisors — KVM, Xen, and vSphere — as well as operating systems — CentOS, RHEL, SUSE, Ubuntu, and Windows. A portfolio approach gives your enterprise the ability to future-proof your cloud strategy, optimize cost and performance, access a global footprint with best-of-breed capabilities, and gain financial flexibility and negotiating leverage.

VMware vRealize Automation automates the delivery of personalized infrastructure, applications and custom IT services.

This cloud automation software lets you deploy across a multi-vendor hybrid cloud infrastructure, giving you both flexibility and investment protection for current and future technology choices.

Agility Through Automation

Automate the end-to-end delivery and management of infrastructure, and accelerate application deployment and releases.

Choice Through Flexibility

Provision and manage multivendor, multicloud infrastructure and applications by leveraging existing infrastructure, tools and processes.

Personalization Through Governance Policies

Ensure that users receive the right size resource or application at the appropriate service level for the jobs they need to perform.

Efficiency Through Cost Containment

Provide consistent, automated delivery and management of IT services and reduce time-consuming, manual processes. Reclaim inactive resources for reuse with automated reclamation, providing cost savings.

OFFER
Learn more about RightScale MultiCloud Platform
Learn more about vRealize Automation
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAmazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, VmwareRent-a-Center, Amway, Vistra Energy, Liberty Mutual
Find out what your peers are saying about RightScale MultiCloud Platform vs vRealize Automation and others in Cloud Management.
Download now
291,379 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email