Compare RIGOL Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes

RIGOL Oscilloscopes is ranked 7th in Oscilloscopes with 1 review while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is ranked 2nd in Oscilloscopes with 23 reviews. RIGOL Oscilloscopes is rated 8.0, while Tektronix Oscilloscopes is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of RIGOL Oscilloscopes writes "The most valuable feature would be the bandwidth". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tektronix Oscilloscopes writes "High sampling rate enables it to clearly render the envelope". RIGOL Oscilloscopes is most compared with Tektronix Oscilloscopes, Keysight Oscilloscopes and Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes, whereas Tektronix Oscilloscopes is most compared with Keysight Oscilloscopes, RIGOL Oscilloscopes and Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes.

RIGOL Oscilloscopes

Tektronix Oscilloscopes

RIGOL Oscilloscopes

Read 1 RIGOL Oscilloscopes review.

285 views|183 comparisons

Tektronix Oscilloscopes

Read 23 Tektronix Oscilloscopes reviews.

994 views|477 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use RIGOL Oscilloscopes? Share your opinion.

Anonymous User

Designer/Consultant at a transportation company

Researched RIGOL Oscilloscopes but chose Tektronix Oscilloscopes.

Being able to monitor data from a CAN bus while the vehicle is running will cut down a lot of the feedback for the design mode. I can obtain things... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Technologies, Tektronix, Rohde & Schwarz and others in Oscilloscopes. Updated: October 2019.

Download now

372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature would be the bandwidth. Read more »	B-scan is its most valuable feature.We have multiple systems for manufacturing tests, and it's critical for our support. The support increases our productivity.It is easy to handle, so everyone likes to use it.Time domain measurement is very accurate compared to other devices.This solution provides high confidence in the data being presented in the measurement to inform a design decision going forward.The user interface is good, not very complicated. It is very intuitive.The most valuable features are its ease of use, user interface, and PAM-4. The user interface is good and easy to use.The sensitivity of the trigger and the reliability are the most valuable features. Read more »
Cons
The memory needs improvement.I had to change the probes to higher frequency probes. Read more »	We are looking for an Intel platform with the newest chipset.I use microservices, but you cannot really probe it, since the technology is not really there.If you are dealing with time domain measurement, I strongly recommend using a vendor other than this company.There are other devices out there which are more capable, offering more features, with as good quality tech support.I want the system to have a wider bandwidth because high-speed continues to move faster, so there is more bandwidth to cover.On the source side, their AWGs don't have enough bandwidth. They need to increase the bandwidth of their AWGs, meaning they have to have a faster sample rate.It needs one button and every time you push it, you get whatever you need.I wish we could turn off the automatic measurement feature of the oscilloscope, for teaching purposes. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice

For the 4-channel big display, you have to upgrade to 500 MHz.The pricing was good.

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Oscilloscopes solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
7th out of 10 in Oscilloscopes Views 285 Comparisons 183 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 288 Avg. Rating 8.0	2nd out of 10 in Oscilloscopes Views 994 Comparisons 477 Reviews 23 Average Words per Review 382 Avg. Rating 8.4
Top Comparisons
Tektronix Oscilloscopes vs. RIGOL Oscilloscopes Compared 48% of the time. Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. RIGOL Oscilloscopes Compared 39% of the time. Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes vs. RIGOL Oscilloscopes Compared 13% of the time. See more RIGOL Oscilloscopes competitors » + Add more products to compare	Keysight Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes Compared 49% of the time. RIGOL Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes Compared 18% of the time. Rohde & Schwarz Oscilloscopes vs. Tektronix Oscilloscopes Compared 18% of the time. See more Tektronix Oscilloscopes competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
7000 Series, MSO5000 Series, 1000Z Series, DS6000 Series, 4000 Series, 2000 Series	TBS Series, TDS Series, MDO Series, MSO Series
Learn
RIGOL Technologies Video Not Available	Tektronix
Overview
Rigol has developed a complete line of digital oscilloscopes to help you achieve faster debugging and testing of your newest designs. Compare our powerful functions and compact designs to your current scope and you'll see we offer state-of-the-art technology. Compare the prices and you'll be surprised how much you can save.	8 out of 10 engineers around the world trust Tektronix to help them debug and test tomorrow's designs faster. With the broadest portfolio of digital oscilloscopes available, the richest set of product features, the most extensive analysis capability and our award-winning service and support, Tektronix has the right oscilloscope to meet your needs.
Offer
Learn more about RIGOL Oscilloscopes Learn More	Learn more about Tektronix Oscilloscopes Learn More

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Keysight Technologies, Tektronix, Rohde & Schwarz and others in Oscilloscopes. Updated: October 2019.

Download now

372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Oscilloscopes reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.