We performed a comparison between Riskified and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"It has taken years to implement."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
Earn 20 points
Riskified is ranked 4th in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 3 reviews while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Riskified is rated 9.0, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Riskified writes "Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Riskified is most compared with Forter, Kount, Amazon Fraud Detector, Accertify Interceptas and Signifyd, whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
