Alluvio AppResponse vs Wireshark comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Riverbed Logo
828 views|601 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Wireshark Logo
1,110 views|650 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Alluvio AppResponse and Wireshark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data.""I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting.""It provides us with complete visibility of every packet.""We really like the scalability capabilities.""AppResponse is a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility into applications at all levels, from Layer 1 to Layer 7. We can trace all those sections: physical, IP, transport, presentation, application, etc. It gives us the full picture.""The most valuable feature is performance monitoring.""The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.""With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."

More Alluvio AppResponse Pros →

"I have found the most valuable feature you can design your sniffer the way you want to.""It's easy to troubleshoot issues because there's a large online community.""The most valuable feature is the traffic gate, which shows which IPs are getting more bandwidth or traffic.""The session-level filtering features are valuable.""The best part about Wireshark, in my opinion, is its ability to analyze packet capture files.""The transmission and reception issues are valuable.""What's best about Wireshark is that it doesn't require installation. It supports cards and monitoring permissions and is sufficient for appending and capturing activities. You won't need to install other tools to use Wireshark, so this saves you time. You can capture packets at any time from your laptop through Wireshark.""Wireshark is a good tool to start with network analyzing and packet capturing."

More Wireshark Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward.""Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse.""The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data.""Technical support needs to be more responsive.""Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse.""The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal.""If Alluvio AppResponse reduces its cost, it will be more beneficial for customers to monitor their application and network performance.""Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems."

More Alluvio AppResponse Cons →

"The product has been using the same GUI for many years.""I would like to see Wireshark improve the ease of application of the command. The command is very powerful, but not easy to apply.""The decryption of encrypted packets could be better.""It is difficult to scale this solution.""I would like better control of bandwidth from the service provider.""We'd like to be able to extract the output into an Excel table.""The average person would probably find Wireshark hard to use. When I first installed it, I was overwhelmed by all the data it was shooting out. It doesn't make sense until you start doing some research and figure out what everything means. It isn't the most user-friendly tool. It just provides so much information.""The system could be improved upon by adding a better and more powerful data processing engine."

More Wireshark Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
  • "The solution is no more expensive than other products."
  • "It is costly for small and medium businesses."
  • More Alluvio AppResponse Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a stand-alone tool. If there is a commercial license for it I am unaware of it."
  • "It is free to download and install. It runs on multiple platforms, so how can you go wrong?"
  • "It's free."
  • "This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
  • "It is free."
  • "Wireshark is free software, so you don't have to pay any licensing fee. Individual people can use it and then donate to Wireshark."
  • "Wireshark is free software, so you can download it and use it for free with no licensing fees."
  • "I am using the free version of this solution."
  • More Wireshark Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
    Top Answer:AppResponse is a little expensive, but the cost depends on your configuration and storage. It was about $200,000 for three years.
    Top Answer:Alluvio AppResponse should improve its ability to expand across multiple operating systems. Alluvio AppResponse should include the ability to monitor Linux servers.
    Top Answer:I wish the filters were a little bit more prepopulated. It would have been easy to hit a drop-down and select a filter. If I only wanted to look at DCP, UDP, or IP, it would be easy to filter it out… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    828
    Comparisons
    601
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    326
    Rating
    9.0
    3rd
    Views
    1,110
    Comparisons
    650
    Reviews
    30
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
    Learn More
    Riverbed
    Video Not Available
    Wireshark
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

    Wireshark is the world's foremost network protocol analyzer.
    Sample Customers
    N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
    Comversion, ADP, Talbots
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Healthcare Company13%
    Transportation Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company14%
    University10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Educational Organization11%
    University11%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business42%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Alluvio AppResponse is ranked 37th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 15 reviews while Wireshark is ranked 3rd in Network Troubleshooting with 61 reviews. Alluvio AppResponse is rated 8.8, while Wireshark is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Alluvio AppResponse writes "It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wireshark writes "User-friendly with an easy setup and a nice interface". Alluvio AppResponse is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE, ThousandEyes, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas Wireshark is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM, ClearSight Analyzer and Microsoft Network Monitor.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.