We performed a comparison between Sangfor WANO and Steelhead based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization.Earn 20 points
Sangfor WANO is ranked 14th in WAN Optimization while Steelhead is ranked 4th in WAN Optimization with 22 reviews. Sangfor WANO is rated 0.0, while Steelhead is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Steelhead writes "Exceptionally stable and reliable but costly". Sangfor WANO is most compared with , whereas Steelhead is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Aruba EdgeConnect SD-WAN Platform, WAAS, Citrix SD-WAN and Noction IRP.
See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.