Compare RSA Archer vs. Thomson Reuters Accelus

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
RSA Archer Logo
6,199 views|4,544 comparisons
Thomson Reuters Accelus Logo
386 views|256 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Archer vs. Thomson Reuters Accelus and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The part I liked about Archer was the risk assessment for deficiencies and being able to use it there.
Top Answer: The problem is, and I've had years and years of experience using it, let's say decades of experience with it, and they keep changing it. It could be as much as two years or so and they change the… more »
Top Answer: For Archer, today there is everything from risk management to looking at security and how to track all the security defects. We don't have Archer connected to ServiceNow. We had the better version… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

out of 52 in GRC
Average Words per Review
out of 52 in GRC
Average Words per Review
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Learn More
Archer adapt enterprise governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) products to your requirements, build applications, and integrate with other systems, control the audit lifecycle to enable improved governance of audit-related activities, data, and processes, reduce the risk of IT and business disruption, harmful operational events, and significant business crises and build an efficient, collaborative governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) program across IT, finance, operations, and legal.

Our solutions dynamically connect business transactions, strategy, and operations to the ever-changing regulatory environment, providing highly regulated firms with informed outcomes. Our client groups include compliance, audit, legal and risk functions within the organization. We partner with firms to manage their risk exposure and accelerate their business at every step. In today’s rapidly changing regulatory environment, organizations need to be empowered with tools

that help them navigate the constantly shifting rules, internal business processes, and regulatory

reporting requirements. Thomson Reuters Accelus™ Compliance Management Solutions provide regulatory insight through the ability to identify, map and track regulatory change, process integrity with workflow designed to communicate, test, and audit controls including policies and training, and transparency with capabilities to evidence risk and controls to management and regulators.

Learn more about RSA Archer
Learn more about Thomson Reuters Accelus
Sample Customers
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Fujitsu, NCDOT, Extraco Banks, Qatar National Bank, EY Team
Top Industries
Computer Software Company28%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider9%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA Archer vs. Thomson Reuters Accelus and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
476,163 professionals have used our research since 2012.

RSA Archer is ranked 2nd in GRC with 4 reviews while Thomson Reuters Accelus is ranked 20th in GRC. RSA Archer is rated 8.8, while Thomson Reuters Accelus is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of RSA Archer writes "A rich feature set helps save time and effort, making us more efficient and saving us money". On the other hand, RSA Archer is most compared with IBM OpenPages, Telos Xacta IA Manager, OneTrust GRC, MetricStream and SAP BusinessObjects GRC, whereas Thomson Reuters Accelus is most compared with SAS Enterprise GRC.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.