RSA Authentication Manager vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

As of February 2019, RSA Authentication Manager is ranked 2nd in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle which is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 1 review. The top reviewer of RSA Authentication Manager writes "The two-factor authentication is a trusted part of the solution". The top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "Roles and connectors for provisioning help govern user access but UI and workflow need improvement". RSA Authentication Manager is most compared with Duo Security, OneSpan DIGIPASS and Entrust IdentityGuard. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with Yubico YubiKey, Symantec VIP and Entrust IdentityGuard.

RSA Authentication Manager

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

RSA Authentication Manager

Read 3 RSA Authentication Manager reviews.

8,095 views|4,072 comparisons

RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Read 1 RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle review.

5,267 views|2,363 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Sambhaji Bhosale

Sr. Security Engineer at a tech services company

The two-factor authentication is a trusted part of the solution.

The advantage to this solution is the two-factor authentication. It is a very trusted part of the solution. It provides benefits usch as secure... Read more »

Anonymous User

Identity and Access Management Engineer at a financial services firm

Roles and connectors for provisioning help govern user access but UI and workflow need improvement

Organizational role management: By defining the roles it made our job easier for new-hire provisioning by automatically granting/creating the... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, RSA, Symantec and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: February 2019.

Download now

317,758 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is a good solution for token identification.The most valuable feature is the provision part. The mapping and the logging is also very good. In addition, the troubleshooting, from a console point of view, is easy for administration and on the provisioning and logging part.Easy setup, deployment, and integration in different infrastructures, including virtual ones. Read more »	Roles, connectors for provisioning and re-accreditation or reviews help greatly to govern user access. Read more »
Cons
We found technical support was not very responsive to our requests for assistance.We have encountered issue when trying to expand this particular solution for a large set of users across the country.Perhaps parts of the the user interface should become more intuitive. Read more »	The user interface and workflow need improvement, and more connectors would help.There are scalability issues. This product does not scale very well. It is not a good product for load balancing / active–active architecture.If you use the appliance version then it won't handle a huge database volume. Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available	Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need. Read more »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 317,758 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd out of 48 in Authentication Systems Views 8,095 Comparisons 4,072 Reviews 3 Followers 287 Avg. Rating 7.7	10th out of 57 in Identity Management (IM) Views 5,267 Comparisons 2,363 Reviews 1 Followers 231 Avg. Rating 5.0
Top Comparisons
Duo Security vs. RSA Authentication Manager Compared 20% of the time. OneSpan DIGIPASS vs. RSA Authentication Manager Compared 15% of the time. Entrust IdentityGuard vs. RSA Authentication Manager Compared 15% of the time. See more RSA Authentication Manager competitors » + Add more products to compare	Yubico YubiKey vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Compared 20% of the time. Symantec VIP vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Compared 13% of the time. Entrust IdentityGuard vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Compared 9% of the time. See more RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
ACE/Server	SecurID
Learn
RSA	RSA
Overview
RSA Authentication Manager is the platform behind RSA SecurID that allows for centralized management of the RSA SecurID environment including authentication methods, users, applications, and agents across multiple physical sites. It verifies authentication requests and centrally administers authentication policies for organizations' end users.	RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
Offer
Learn more about RSA Authentication Manager Learn More	Learn more about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Learn More
Sample Customers
Tiera, Fred Loya, BRE Leasing, ADP, BlueFort Security, New Hanover County	NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, RSA, Symantec and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: February 2019.

Download now

317,758 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.