• Home
  • Entrust Identity Essentials vs. RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle

Entrust Identity Essentials vs RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Entrust Identity Essentials and RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Yubico, Fortinet and others in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
To learn more, read our detailed Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Entrust Identity Essentials?
Harshul Nayak
Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Pricing varies based on user count/number of modules you need."
  • "We are using the cloud platform, but we don't find it compatible to be served as a multi-tenant platform. This is a large drawback. It becomes expensive because it is then an all-dedicated solution. You have to have a separate tenant for each client, which increases the cost. The overall unit pricing can be less expensive than how it is right now."
  • "I rate the product's price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."

    • More RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:With the tool in place, you need to hire fewer people to provide access, and you have control over your processes.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What needs improvement with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:Every connector that you have in the product needs to be custom-built, so there are not a lot of standard connectors available in the product, because of which there are a lot of hidden consultancy… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle?
    Top Answer:RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle can be deployed on the cloud or on-premise. We have our own proprietary cloud solution created along with RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle and it's deployed… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 9 in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
    Views
    79
    Comparisons
    68
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    22nd
    out of 76 in Identity Management (IM)
    Views
    941
    Comparisons
    646
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    726
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SMS PASSCODE
    SecurID
    Learn More
    Entrust Datacard
    Video Not Available
    RSA
    Overview

    Fast, cost effective multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution that lets Windows-based organizations realize a Zero Trust approach.

    RSA SecurID provides world-leading two-factor authentication, protecting 25,000 organizations and 55 million users. RSA SecurID extends security to bring your own device (BYOD), cloud, and mobile as well as traditional virtual private network (VPN) and web portals. RSA SecurID solutions comprise three primary components: authenticator, platform, and agents.
    Sample Customers
    Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik, AVEA, AZ Klina, Bashneft, BSR, Coop, Day Group, DEME, Digitale Gardemoen iks, Herbert Smith Freehills, Holstebro Kommune, Horten, Ikano, Intersport, JB Hifi, King Faisal special hospital and research center, Leaseplan, McDonald's, NSB, NZ Telecom, Orkla, Postnord, Rom Telecom, Slater and Gordon, Supercell, Transgrid, UPM, Widex
    NTT Com Asia, Virgin Blue, Bank of Uganda, EMEA Telecommunications Company, LAit (Lazio Innovazione Tecnologica), NyNet, OTP Bank, Red Bull Racing, Rupert House School, Signify, UK Local Authority, Bancolombia, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (BPPR), TIVIT, Array Services, International Computerware, KPMG LLP, Moffitt Cancer Center
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Yubico, Fortinet and others in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Entrust Identity Essentials is ranked 5th in Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is ranked 22nd in Identity Management (IM) with 9 reviews. Entrust Identity Essentials is rated 0.0, while RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is rated 6.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle writes "Lacking customization, poor support, but useful auditing". Entrust Identity Essentials is most compared with , whereas RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt, One Identity Manager, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine).

    We monitor all Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.