Compare RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) vs. SafeBreach

RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is ranked 6th in Advanced Threat Protection with 6 reviews while SafeBreach is ranked 14th in Advanced Threat Protection. RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is rated 6.6, while SafeBreach is rated 0. The top reviewer of RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) writes "Provides accurate information, quick analysis from the endpoint perspective, and quick identification of any potential malware". On the other hand, RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM) is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar and ArcSight, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Acalvio, Fireglass and CyberArk PAS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SafeBreach? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment.This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap.The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive.It is cheap.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,554
Comparisons
4,363
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
392
Avg. Rating
6.5
Views
692
Comparisons
355
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Also Known As
RSA Security Analytics
Learn
RSA
SafeBreach
Overview

If you’re relying on log data to detect and prevent cyber threats, you’re in trouble. Attackers increasingly evade detection of log-centric security and network monitoring tools. But logs combined with full packet, endpoint NetFlow data are proven to provide the essential details for early threat detection. Here’s a closer look at our solution.

SafeBreach lightweight simulators play the role of the hacker. Deploy them in critical segments of your network, in the cloud or on your endpoint to simulate the entire kill chain- infiltration, lateral movement and exfiltration. Both network and endpoint simulators are available.

The Safebreach orchestration platform manages and executes the Hacker's Playbook™ of breach methods on our simulators. Our patent-pending technology simulates breach scenarios without impacting users or infrastructure, but while validating the effectiveness of your security solutions. Breach methods are constantly updated by SafeBreach Labs, our team of offensive security researchers.

Offer
Learn more about RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets (RSA SIEM)
Learn more about SafeBreach
Sample Customers
Los Angeles World Airports, Reply
Information Not Available
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Check Point, FireEye and others in Advanced Threat Protection. Updated: October 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email