NetWitness Platform vs SafeBreach comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetWitness Logo
1,183 views|721 comparisons
74% willing to recommend
SafeBreach Logo
2,055 views|1,163 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NetWitness Platform and SafeBreach based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Log Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In my opinion, the solution's most valuable feature is its capacity to monitor network traffic, logs from devices within the network, and network captures. This capability extends beyond logs to include full network capturing.""Possibility to investigate incidents based on logs and raw packets, such as extracting files sent over the network""It's fully scalable. There is no limit. Of course, the license limits per day the number of terabytes. In my opinion, it's very flexible.""The most valuable feature is the ability to write rules and triggers for network communication, and then being able to investigate based on that.""The most valuable feature is the correlation. It can report in real-time and monitor the management.""It gives the ability to investigate into network traffic in the Net and the organization what we couldn't do before.""The most valuable feature of RSA NetWitness Logs and Packets are the alerts and correlations tools.""The software is scalable to whatever is required, and you can also put a lot of resources in the cloud."

More NetWitness Platform Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.""The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."

More SafeBreach Pros →

Cons
"I believe that integrating the solution with other products such as Oracle would be beneficial.""It is not so easy to customize this product.""The initial setup is complex. There are other solutions that are easier to implement.""Its technical support could be better.""The multi-tenant capabilities are lagging compared to IBM QRadar.""I'd like to see improvement in its ease of use. It's basically unusable. It's overly complex.""The implementation needs assistance.""An area for improvement would be better automation and more inbuilt use cases."

More NetWitness Platform Cons →

"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.""There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."

More SafeBreach Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It’s cheaper to run virtual machines in a VMware environment."
  • "The new pricing and licensing mechanisms are fair. I would advise always to get the full solution (i.e., not only Logs)."
  • "It is cheap."
  • "The licenses are good but the cost is very expensive."
  • "This is a pricey solution; it's not cheap."
  • "We have a perpetual license, so the total cost of ownership is not very expensive. It's a good investment."
  • "Many clients are not able to purchase the packet capability because there is a huge amount of data, and the cost depends on the number of EPS (Events per second), as well as the number of gigabytes of data per day."
  • "Our license is for one year."
  • More NetWitness Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price starts from about $140,000 so this solution is expensive in my opinion. Maintenance and support is included in the license cost."
  • "The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today."
  • More SafeBreach Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Vinod Shankar
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not at all difficult.
    Top Answer:The product price was reasonable for my region and the market.
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, the NetWitness Platform needs to release new features and improve in areas like log correlation. The tool needs to have easier integrations with the cloud. Building a… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection.
    Top Answer:The pricing is more expensive than other options on the market today.
    Top Answer:I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support.
    Ranking
    20th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    1,183
    Comparisons
    721
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    458
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    2,055
    Comparisons
    1,163
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    178
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    RSA Security Analytics
    Learn More
    NetWitness
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NetWitness Platform is an evolved SIEM and threat detection and response solution that functions as a single, unified platform for ALL your security data. It features an advanced analyst workbench for triaging alerts and incidents, and it orchestrates security operations programs end to end. In short: NetWitness Platform is all you need to run an intelligent SOC.

    SafeBreach is the world's most widely used continuous security validation platform in enterprise companies. The company's patented platform empowers CISOs and their teams to validate security controls, maximize their effectiveness, and drive down risk. 

    SafeBreach provides a "hacker's view" of an enterprise's security posture by continuously validating security controls and presenting findings in customized dashboards to enable stakeholders to cleanly focus on the biggest risk to the organization. SafeBreach automatically and safely executes thousands of attack methods to validate network, endpoint, cloud, container, and email security controls against the Hacker's Playbook, the world's largest collection of attack data broken down by methods, tactics, and threat actors. Data from SafeBreach validations can improve SOC team responses and empower management to make smarter decisions to better manage risk and invest resources.

    Sample Customers
    Los Angeles World Airports, Reply
    PayPal, ICON, Netflix, Johnson & Johnson, CVS Health, Pepsi, Kellogg's, Cisco, Deloitte
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider24%
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Computer Software Company24%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government10%
    Insurance Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Log Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Datadog, Wazuh and others in Log Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NetWitness Platform is ranked 20th in Log Management with 36 reviews while SafeBreach is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. NetWitness Platform is rated 7.4, while SafeBreach is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of NetWitness Platform writes "Can find out if there is lateral movement, but integration and workflow need improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". NetWitness Platform is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, RSA enVision, IBM Security QRadar, Microsoft Sentinel and Cisco Secure Network Analytics, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ and XM Cyber.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.