Galvanize IncidentBond vs SECDO Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize Logo
49 views|35 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Palo Alto Networks Logo
266 views|81 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galvanize IncidentBond and SECDO Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response.
To learn more, read our detailed Security Incident Response Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The customization and the transparency of data while still maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI, are key features. It allows for me, as an engineer, to evolve the individual components and modules, and to create a much more meaningful picture than the individual pieces in isolation ever could."

More Galvanize IncidentBond Pros →

"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature.""It basically automates the entire alert investigation process.""Technical support is great. Palo Alto is extremely helpful and responsive."

More SECDO Platform Pros →

Cons
"Stable – Release – Experimental" system with their releases, and all the proper checks and balances, I’d be an incredibly happy individual. I can appreciate the cause and affect, wherein the customization of the tool drives rapid release schedules, and the paradox that creates with the idea of stable releases. I’d also like more transparency about known bugs and issues."

More Galvanize IncidentBond Cons →

"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market.""Many will try to use this as an out-of-the-box solution, however, it needs to be configured to fit what a company would like to do with it.""Maybe the notifications setting could use a simpler setting."

More SECDO Platform Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Be sure of the actual number of endpoints in your company."
  • "The price of this solution is the highest in the market, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • More SECDO Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    49
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    266
    Comparisons
    81
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IncidentBond, Rsam SIRP, Rsam Incident Management, Rsam Security Incident Response Platform
    Learn More
    Galvanize
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Rsam’s Security Incident Response Platform (SIRP) simplifies and speeds monitoring and resolution. Our dynamic workflow can replicate any existing incident management process and allows you to make changes as your processes evolve - all from a single interface. Track the lifecycle of a security incident and coordinate actions quickly and with ease. 

    SECDO enables security teams to identify and remediate incidents fast. Using thread-level endpoint monitoring and causality analytics, SECDO provides visibility into every endpoint along with the context necessary for understanding whether a suspicious activity is a genuine threat. Unique deception techniques force threats like ransomware out into the open early, and trigger automated containment and remediation.

    SECDO provides the most intuitive investigation experience available so you can quickly unravel complex incidents across the organization.  You can investigate incidents detected by SECDO as well as alerts from the SIEM. SECDO visualizes the attack chain so you immediately understand the “who, what, where, when and how” behind the incident. Then, based on an analysis of exactly how endpoints were compromised, SECDO surgically remediates the incident with minimum user impact.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Valley National Bank, IDT Corporation
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Real Estate/Law Firm7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Security Incident Response
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, ServiceNow, IBM and others in Security Incident Response. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Galvanize IncidentBond is ranked 11th in Security Incident Response while SECDO Platform is ranked 9th in Security Incident Response. Galvanize IncidentBond is rated 9.0, while SECDO Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize IncidentBond writes "Customization and transparency of data, while maintaining a mostly user-friendly UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Great documentation, good technical support, and very in-depth". Galvanize IncidentBond is most compared with , whereas SECDO Platform is most compared with Fortinet FortiSOAR and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.

    See our list of best Security Incident Response vendors.

    We monitor all Security Incident Response reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.