We performed a comparison between Ruckus Wireless and Ubiquiti WLAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless LAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most useful feature of Juniper Wireless AP is the reporting Marvis."
"It provides private network access, helping us protect our company’s devices."
"The solution is stable."
"The artificial intelligence feature is very good."
"The solution is pretty generic and easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is Marvis, the AI-driven network management system."
"In terms of reporting, in terms of all the user reports, it's very rich."
"With Mist, every Wednesday they roll out new features."
"The scalability has been very good."
"The biggest advantages of Ruckus Wireless are pricing and support."
"One of the biggest features of Ruckus Wireless is its BeamFlex+ technology."
"Its high capacity is the most valuable. It is also very stable. It is way more stable than other platforms."
"The reason we picked Ruckus, in addition to our long-standing relationship with them, is pretty much that the RFS characteristics of it seem to be the best."
"The solution manages and updates itself."
"The solution provides superior coverage."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"would rate the scalability a nine out of ten. It is very scalable."
"The management features are valuable."
"The initial setup was very straightforward."
"Firstly, I initially purchased the device to build a VPN, and one very valuable feature for me was the ability to create a layer two VPN, which was available on the legacy ER router. It allowed me to expand a subnet to a remote site, which was essential for my setup. Additionally, I appreciated that the CLI of the router was similar to other Juniper products that I was familiar with."
"The solution is very easy to install."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the workflow-driven setup for the infrastructure component."
"For me, the ease of configuration is a valuable feature."
"The most beneficial thing about Ubiquiti is that it is simple to deploy."
"The price could be better."
"They should include SD-WAN features to it."
"If you want to do more specific stuff, it's a bit limited."
"The solution is expensive."
"There is room for improvement in terms of support and installation."
"The product should include adaptive Wi-Fi to show a more accurate location."
"Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points’ support services need improvement."
"Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series) could improve if the MIST platform had a built-in master key. This would be an advantage."
"The solution isn't the cheapest option. However, you are getting a quality product."
"Captive portal for guest access on the controller could be enhanced."
"The pricing of the product can be a bit expensive. They should work on making pricing more competitive."
"Its security can be improved. It doesn't use Wireless IPS. Therefore, we have to combine WatchGuard that uses a Wireless IPS but is a separate solution. These two solutions work in conjunction. We are using the WatchGuard as a sensor and Wireless IPS, and Ruckus is like a platform that is used for the connectivity of the network."
"Ruckus products, overall, have a wide range of useful features, however not all customers have the budget to buy a corporate Wi-Fi solution. Most of the time, it's far too expensive for our clients to consider going with Ruckus, and they might like to see cheaper solutions in the Ruckus range."
"The pricing needs to be more clear and licensing could be less expensive."
"It is extremely difficult to send videos in Ruckus live sessions. Zoom streaming, or using Teams Streaming live sessions to send videos, for example, could be more effective."
"The cloud system from Ruckus is not mature enough just yet."
"The product needs to improve the user interface in the migration from old to new versions."
"Ubiquiti WLAN would be improved with the addition of individual AP configuration, which would allow for fine-tuning of individual access points and logins."
"The solution could improve by having a cloud version. A cloud version is the easiest to configure anywhere in the world."
"It is not a stable solution."
"The solution needs to improve robustness, security, and stability."
"The logs are not detailed enough. You can't clearly see what is being blocked in Ubiquiti WLAN, making the troubleshooting process a little bit harder."
"Largely we're happy with the product, however, the firmware deployments could maybe be managed a little bit differently."
"The solution should include and expand on a central management system."
More Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ruckus Wireless is ranked 3rd in Wireless LAN with 95 reviews while Ubiquiti WLAN is ranked 5th in Wireless LAN with 35 reviews. Ruckus Wireless is rated 8.6, while Ubiquiti WLAN is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless writes "Great wireless, good reliability, and excellent connectivity". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti WLAN writes "Helps to build VPNs but improvement is needed in stability ". Ruckus Wireless is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, ExtremeWireless and Fortinet FortiWLM, whereas Ubiquiti WLAN is most compared with Aruba Wireless, Cisco Wireless, Omada Access Points, NETGEAR Insight Access Points and WatchGuard Secure Wi‑Fi. See our Ruckus Wireless vs. Ubiquiti WLAN report.
See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.