Most Helpful Review
Use Thru? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about RepliWeb Managed File Transfer vs. Safe-T Software-Defined Access and others in Managed File Transfer.
295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 31% of the time.
See more Safe-T Software-Defined Access competitors »
Compared 29% of the time.
|See more Thru competitors »|
Also Known As
|Also Known As||Safe-T SDA, Safe-T|
Safe-T’s Software-Defined Access is a multi-layered solution, addressing the applications and data access challenge in a hybrid cloud environment. The perimeter is ever expanding, with the introduction of remote access, IOT, BYOD and cloud services. By deploying Safe-T’s solution, you can now unify and streamline all your access and exchange systems and modernize your security perimeter on-premise and in the cloud. It protects and controls access by separating the access layer from the authentication layer, and by segmenting internal networks. This reduces the attack surface and mitigating the risk of external threats such as network DDoS, SSL based attacks, application attacks and more.
Thru’s File Exchange and Collaboration Platform, with its expansive integration capability and global presence, unshackles the limits on the most challenging Managed File Transfer, Software Delivery and Content Collaboration requirements on a single platform.
Learn more about Safe-T Software-Defined Access
Learn more about Thru
|Sample Customers||Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash||Dell EMC, Plus 500, VMware, HKS, Manhattan Associates, Blackbaud, Costa Cruises, VMware|