We performed a comparison between SafeBreach and Symantec Web Isolation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The most valuable feature of Symantec Web Isolation is the user-friendliness of the solution."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"Symantec Web Isolation could improve by reducing licensing costs."
SafeBreach is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while Symantec Web Isolation is ranked 23rd in Anti-Malware Tools with 1 review. SafeBreach is rated 8.0, while Symantec Web Isolation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Web Isolation writes "User-friendly, reliable, and good support". SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, AttackIQ, Pentera and XM Cyber, whereas Symantec Web Isolation is most compared with Menlo Security Secure Web Gateway.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
