We performed a comparison between SafeBreach and Verodin based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Cymulate, Picus Security and others in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS)."The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
"The integration engine needs to improve."
Earn 20 points
SafeBreach is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews while Verodin is ranked 10th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). SafeBreach is rated 8.0, while Verodin is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, AttackIQ, Pentera and Fortra's Cobalt Strike, whereas Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Picus Security, Cymulate and Pentera.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
