Compare SafeBreach vs. Verodin

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SafeBreach Logo
1,208 views|713 comparisons
Verodin Logo
748 views|548 comparisons
Ranking
Views
1,208
Comparisons
713
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
748
Comparisons
548
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Learn
SafeBreach
FireEye
Overview

SafeBreach lightweight simulators play the role of the hacker. Deploy them in critical segments of your network, in the cloud or on your endpoint to simulate the entire kill chain- infiltration, lateral movement and exfiltration. Both network and endpoint simulators are available.

The Safebreach orchestration platform manages and executes the Hacker's Playbook™ of breach methods on our simulators. Our patent-pending technology simulates breach scenarios without impacting users or infrastructure, but while validating the effectiveness of your security solutions. Breach methods are constantly updated by SafeBreach Labs, our team of offensive security researchers.

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

Offer
Learn more about SafeBreach
Learn more about Verodin
Sample Customers
PayPal, ICON, NetflixAAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Media Company11%
Comms Service Provider10%
Real Estate/Law Firm10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Media Company12%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government8%
SafeBreach is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) while Verodin is ranked 3rd in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). SafeBreach is rated 0.0, while Verodin is rated 0.0. On the other hand, SafeBreach is most compared with Cymulate, AttackIQ, FireEye Network Security, Picus Security and Acalvio, whereas Verodin is most compared with Cymulate, AttackIQ, Picus Security, XM Cyber HaXM and Pcysys.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.