SAND [EOL] vs Teradata IntelliFlex comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAND Technology Logo
views| comparisons
Teradata Logo
493 views|302 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAND [EOL] and Teradata IntelliFlex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee for Teradata IntelliFlex, which is very expensive."
  • More Teradata IntelliFlex Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution's banking model, called FSLDM (Financial Services Logical Data Model), is sophisticated and good.
    Top Answer:The solution’s pricing, scalability, and technical support response time could be improved.
    Top Answer:We use Teradata IntelliFlex for data warehousing, which is a way of presenting data for faster retrieval.
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Data Warehouse
    11th
    out of 34 in Data Warehouse
    Views
    493
    Comparisons
    302
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    606
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    SAND Technology
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    SAND delivers a world class performing Enterprise Analytic Database Platform. The SAND Platform is a patented columnar database management system (CDBMS), delivering optimal performance for every user. Generation based concurrency control (GBCC) technology supports thousands of concurrent users with massive and constantly growing data. SAND delivers on the promise of sharing data throughout the Enterprise, providing instant access, driving decision-making, and ensuring the best information is in the hands of the right people at the right time.

    Teradata IntelliFlex delivers real-time intelligence to place vital data into the hands of front-line decision makers, while extending traditional data warehouse functionality into the realm of tactical decision making. With IntelliFlex, you can combine both these strategic and operational workloads in a single data warehouse.

    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm28%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Retailer8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise83%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Warehouse
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAND [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Warehouse while Teradata IntelliFlex is ranked 11th in Data Warehouse with 5 reviews. SAND [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Teradata IntelliFlex is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata IntelliFlex writes "A tool that provides high performance and speed to its users, along with an exceptional scalability option". SAND [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Teradata IntelliFlex is most compared with Teradata and Oracle Exadata.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.