SAND [EOL] vs SAP Business Warehouse comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAND Technology Logo
views| comparisons
SAP Logo
1,298 views|804 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAND [EOL] and SAP Business Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Warehouse Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's moderately expensive, but definitely has its branding and price value for it."
  • "It's quite pricey. SAP changed its pricing policy, so they give you one engine and then you have to buy everything next to it, like MSS, the BPC licenses, and everything else."
  • "The license for SAP Business Warehouse is paid yearly, and there's no extra cost in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "Overall, the pricing is not fixed and is expensive."
  • "The licensing cost for SAP Business Warehouse depends on your revenue. Its licensing structure is a little bit complicated. The more your revenue is, the higher the price, but SAP does have different pricing structures for various companies. For small businesses, licensing isn't based on revenue, but for big companies, it's revenue-based. There's some agreement regarding pricing for huge companies, so it's different, and SAP Business Warehouse pricing isn't fixed. On a scale of one to ten, I'm rating the licensing cost for SAP Business Warehouse as five because it's very high. As your revenue grows, your licensing cost also increases, so you have to factor that in when calculating your cost."
  • "SAP Business Warehouse licensing is a bit expensive compared to other products in the market."
  • "I would not recommend it to small-scale companies. The price is too much."
  • "The solution is quite expensive."
  • More SAP Business Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The solution is quite expensive. We paid a yearly subscription fee.
    Top Answer:Over a period, we realized that the license and maintenance costs were quite expensive. Every day, we had to run the background job ODS. Eventually, we moved away from SAP Business Warehouse and… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Data Warehouse
    8th
    Views
    1,298
    Comparisons
    804
    Reviews
    13
    Average Words per Review
    626
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    SAND Technology
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    SAND delivers a world class performing Enterprise Analytic Database Platform. The SAND Platform is a patented columnar database management system (CDBMS), delivering optimal performance for every user. Generation based concurrency control (GBCC) technology supports thousands of concurrent users with massive and constantly growing data. SAND delivers on the promise of sharing data throughout the Enterprise, providing instant access, driving decision-making, and ensuring the best information is in the hands of the right people at the right time.

    Reporting, analysis and interpretation of business data are crucial to preserve and enhance the competitive edge of companies by optimizing processes and enabling them to react quickly and in line with market needs. SAP Business Warehouse (SAP BW) provides tools and functions that enable companies to attain these goals. In SAP BW, you can integrate, transform, and consolidate relevant business information from productive SAP applications and external data sources. SAP BW provides you with a high-performance infrastructure that helps you evaluate and interpret data. Decision makers can make well-founded decisions and identify target-orientated activities on the basis of the analyzed data.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Medtronic, Cirque du Soleil, Antarc, B&G Manufacturing, EarlySense, eBay, Ferrero, James Austin Company, Lenovo, Sagem, RAK Ceramics, Vodafone
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Insurance Company19%
    Non Tech Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Warehouse
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Snowflake Computing, Oracle, Teradata and others in Data Warehouse. Updated: April 2024.
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SAND [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Warehouse while SAP Business Warehouse is ranked 8th in Cloud Data Warehouse with 25 reviews. SAND [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SAP Business Warehouse is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Business Warehouse writes "Offers powerful analytics and integration capabilities but requires improved upgrade processes". SAND [EOL] is most compared with , whereas SAP Business Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Snowflake, BigQuery, SAP BW4HANA and Amazon Redshift.

    See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors and best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.