We performed a comparison between SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and SAP HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Relational Databases Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a wonderful database that is, in my opinion, underrated. Users are able to get the most out of my experience by taking advantage of its centralized environment."
"I like that SAP ASE can match code and the database index to index data in the programming language. There are many other valuable features, such as the table buffer, tuning, and various control agents like dispatcher. SAP ASE can handle many different data types, including views, domains, data elements, structures, objects, and various table types that are most useful in the application. Its modularization technique is also handy."
"They provide easy integration with other systems."
"The actual interface is good."
"SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is a good transactional database."
"Provides very good integration."
"It's user-friendly, especially in the logistics field."
"The solution offers advanced features that the company was struggling to implement."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The product handles high volumes very well and provides good integration."
"What I like best about SAP HANA is that it's faster than Microsoft SQL Server."
"The solution is easy to scale."
"The solution is very stable."
"SAP HANA's interface is pretty user-friendly."
"SAP HANA is a stable solution."
"Cost-wise, SAP is still expensive compared to other available products."
"User interface could be more user friendly."
"SAP should refine its debugging method, and the process needs to be a little faster. It should use more Pragmas and fewer pseudocomments. I would like if SAP added more features based on advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and voice control. The modularization and if-else techniques could also incorporate the latest technology to code and solve complex problems. The SAP Editor should be more elaborative, and it should allow many more types of statements for all uses."
"The solution should improve view partitioning. The documentation is very confined and available only for users. Distributors also would like access to it."
"I think that the solution needs to be positioned better within the market as it appears as though the Adaptive Server is being left out of the SAP scope."
"There could be some improvements in barcode scanning and RFID access."
"Because the solution is customized. we do occasionally face unique bugs. There are always some changes that need to be made here and there."
"In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies."
"You cannot apply mulit-join inside the calculation views, for example, when you are joining tables."
"Per SAP, you can do both transactional and analytical processes in SAP HANA. Though that's true, the speed is slower when you combine the two functions, so this is what I'd like SAP to improve in SAP HANA. In the next release, I want to see better diagrams in SAP HANA and a more user-friendly interface."
"The JDBC connectors are very slow."
"I would like to see improvements in the connectivity of the solution with other BI software. Not every software can connect to it natively."
"They should develop and improve the solution's data management system."
"The user experience should be better. Its user interface is not good. I also don't like the transition concept."
"I'd just like to see some more improvements done on the training, both on the functional training and technical training sides as a part of the complete solution."
More SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is ranked 17th in Relational Databases Tools with 10 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases Tools with 79 reviews. SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is rated 8.6, while SAP HANA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise writes " Loaded with a lot of features but the price is a drawback ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Excellent compatibility between modules and the control". SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise is most compared with SQL Server, SAP SQL Anywhere, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database and SAP IQ, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, MySQL, IBM Db2 Database and Oracle Database In-Memory. See our SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.