We performed a comparison between SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The integration capabilities of the product are pretty good."
"Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"I do like the collaboration around documents. The versioning history has proven useful in some instances as well."
"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"Information is much more readily available."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product could be improved in a lot of way. It is so frustrating to get things to work as advertised."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"There's a challenge with desktop applications synchronizing with online documents in real-time. If someone is working on a document in the desktop version of Excel, for example, and someone else is editing the same document online, the changes won't sync immediately. That's the only real challenge we've encountered."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
More SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is ranked 14th in Enterprise Content Management with 1 review while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is rated 9.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management writes "A stable tool with good integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager and IBM ECM, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
