We performed a comparison between SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There's a minimum amount of downtime when using the solution. This platform is very effective."
"One of the features that I've found most useful is that It's very simple. They take care of the technical aspects of the data, installations, patches."
"I am impressed with how the solution integrates with the ME system and ALE IDocs."
"We have a wide range of use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud. These include production planning, materials management, sales management, treasury, finance, appliance maintenance, real estate, and warehouse management."
"The scalability is good because we have some cloud resources to support the ERP."
"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"What I like the most is that we can convert databases into a proper multi-dimensional model, and then we can project with the integration with Power BI."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"The Fiori interface is the most valuable feature. It's one of the highlights that they offer. The in-memory of S4 is very fast."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"I would rate this solution as a nine out of ten because it covers all the fields, has a big maturity, and has something other solutions are missing, which is speed."
"Provides good performance and regular release of new features."
"SAP S4HANA on AWS is an easy-to-use solution."
"It is indeed a stable solution, but it depends on how you architecture the component in AWS. If the component has the right architecture and is properly provisioned and placed, then it will be a stable platform."
"The stability of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The stability needs to be improved to be able to handle large amounts of data."
"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."
"The cost could be improved. I think it's higher than the competition."
"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."
"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."
"SAP support isn't on par with products like Microsoft Azure or AWS. It's nowhere close to the competitors."
"The solution is scalable from an infrastructure point of view. However, it becomes more complex over time because technology is changing so fast."
"The GUI is age-old, the pricing is too high for hardware and older customizations are not working consistently."
"The initial setup could be easier. It's complex."
"Doesn't have a common development environment."
"The solution is costlier than other products."
"Businesses are particularly interested in process automation, mobile, and web applications. These are the areas that SAP S4HANA is and should be looking to improve on, especially in terms of streamlining processes and automating certain steps."
"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."
"The product could use more capabilities in the areas of robotics, machine learning and artificial intelligence, but these improvements are already on the way."
"Over the last three to four years, I haven't encountered significant issues with SAP S/4HANA. While occasional system bugs are normal in software, the overall experience has been positive. As a business partner, it stands out as a reliable ERP solution."
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is ranked 8th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 21 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is rated 8.0, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud writes "High stability, reasonably priced, and important for digital transformations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) and SAP Hybris on AWS, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
