Compare SAP HANA vs. SAP IQ

SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 11 reviews while SAP IQ is ranked 10th in Relational Databases with 1 review. SAP HANA is rated 8.2, while SAP IQ is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "We can get more tenders because of the lower cost while providing a better product or service". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "An excellent column-based, enterprise relational database solution with good speed and compression". SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database and Oracle Database In-Memory, whereas SAP IQ is most compared with Apache Hadoop, SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise and SAP HANA.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP HANA Logo
10,492 views|8,624 comparisons
SAP IQ Logo
3,852 views|2,736 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: December 2019.
390,245 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The memory is the solution's most valuable feature. It's the main feature of HANA. Others are still the regular IT databases that are on storage and are therefore much slower than HANA. The solution is quite fast.The user interface is very good. You can do any kind of reporting analytics from the platform.The data storage requirement is reduced from the original database to the HANA database.The functionality is of the solution is very good.One feature I find very valuable, is the response time of the application on the database memory.Integration is the most valuable feature we use SAP HANA for.The most value for us was in terms of using it to issue tenders online. We host our server, but it is open to the public, so clients who want to buy those tenders were able to go online, put their tender documents up, and we could evaluate them using SAP.If you want to scale with new processes and new reports, that's fairly easy.

Read more »

Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database.

Read more »

Cons
Unlike other databases, it lacks management features that legacy databases like Oracle or SQL servers have. They need to make the solution easier to manage and offer tools that make management more effective. A lot of things you have on traditional databases you have to develop into HANA.When you do a report on a non-SAP platform, you face some compatibility problems.I think that the pricing is high and it needs improvement.The challenge right now is all databases are on S4 HANA architecture. You're running it for HANA, but not all the functionalities are available. If they can speed up getting all the databases on S4 HANA that would help.If the developers were to enhance or improve the application logic while processing the transactions, that would be great.FI, or the financial module of SAP, has room for improvement. It has to have some better localization for the Middle East, especially in regards to taxes and the letter of credit cycle. I would like to see better localization from the HCM.The interface is a little bit hard to customize. You almost have to consult the SAP original developer to change it.In terms of improvement, the speed is not as good as we thought it would be. That is why we are trying different solutions that will be built with different technologies.

Read more »

The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
People who are technical will accept the cost, but financially they will assess whether this solution will bring them revenue or not. People often ask, how will I profit when the cost is so high?Set up a consortium of consulting partners and hardware vendors to define your tech. Landscape TCO (total cost of ownership) and then approach the OEM for pricing (on-premise or on cloud or a hybrid model). Check if you can bring your own licenses for some of the existing application licenses on the new platform, to reduce TCO.

Read more »

The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
390,245 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
4th
Views
10,492
Comparisons
8,624
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
429
Avg. Rating
8.3
10th
Views
3,852
Comparisons
2,736
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,235
Avg. Rating
8.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
SAP High-Performance Analytic Appliance, HANASybase IQ
Learn
SAP
SAP
Overview

The SAP HANA® platform helps you reimagine business by combining a robust database with services for creating innovative applications. It enables real-time business by converging trans-actions and analytics on one in-memory platform. Running on premise or in the cloud, SAP HANA untangles IT complexity, bringing huge savings in data management and empowering decision makers everywhere with new insight and predictive power.

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

Offer
Learn more about SAP HANA
Learn more about SAP IQ
Sample Customers
Unilever, NHS 24, adidas Group, CHIO Aachen, Hamburg Port Authority (HPA), Bangkok Airways Public Company LimitedASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company29%
Construction Company14%
Transportation Company14%
Non Tech Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider10%
Retailer6%
Media Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm67%
Marketing Services Firm11%
Insurance Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: December 2019.
390,245 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.