We performed a comparison between Cegid and SAP HCM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool provides a lot of options."
"The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have."
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."
"The solution has a great payroll engine."
"The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team."
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine."
"The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."
"The stability of the solution is good."
"The setup was straightforward."
"They have some interesting features in the learning space."
"The payroll and time management features are useful."
"It has the best data management features."
"When you maintain your data in SAP, you can generate any kind of HR report with one click."
"The master data where most of the reports were run from was the most valuable. We were quite satisfied with this module."
"Recently, the localization versions for different countries were increased, and that added value to the solution."
"Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself."
"I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution."
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."
"training and performance could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades."
"In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom."
"The solution is a little bit slow."
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."
"The current platform is quite rigid and not as flexible and end-user friendly as other HR solutions."
"System usability is a challenge."
"We find some challenges in the integration between SAP HCM and SAP SuccessFactors."
"The product's license is very expensive."
"The extensibility of the integration could be improved."
"The talent modules are lacking in HCM, so I would recommend switching to SuccessFactors for talent management, but HCM excels at time management and payroll."
"The setup comes with a set of challenges as well."
"The organizational structure visualization could be improved in future releases. The solution has a very poor interface."
Cegid is ranked 24th in Talent Management with 12 reviews while SAP HCM is ranked 4th in Talent Management with 45 reviews. Cegid is rated 7.2, while SAP HCM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HCM writes "Efficiently handles the entire hire-to-retire cycle management within an organization and the ability to scale is outstanding". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, UKG and BambooHR, whereas SAP HCM is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, ADP GlobalView Payroll and ADP Workforce Now. See our Cegid vs. SAP HCM report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.