Compare SAP IQ vs. SQL Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP IQ Logo
2,085 views|1,438 comparisons
SQL Server Logo
20,780 views|16,213 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database."

More SAP IQ Pros »

"The most valuable feature is replication because we had several replicas of the SQL Server database in different geographical locations.""The availability is the most valuable feature. It has high availability. It also has good performance.""SQL is very easy to manage.""It helps with moving the design of the database into reality.""The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is easy to code.""Very good security features.""The features that we have found the most valuable are reliability, availability perspective, and current scalability.""The latest version supports for big data analytics. SQL Server's vector processing-based batch execution mode is now available to the entire execution of R or Python code. Since much of the work that tends to be done in R and Python involves aggregation, batch mode - which processes rows of data several at a time, can be very helpful."

More SQL Server Pros »

Cons
"The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future."

More SAP IQ Cons »

"I would like to have more replication scenarios.""In terms of improvement, it could use more integration with other products.""Occasionally the performance, as good as it is, is a bit off. We sometimes experience memory spiking. If they could maybe fix that aspect of the solution, that would be quite helpful for our organization.""The product overall would benefit from the addition of better tutorials to help master the skills necessary to actually build a project database. Right now, what is available isn't sufficient.""In terms of what could be improved, everything on-premise is now moving to the cloud. Obviously SQL Server has also moved, because Microsoft Excel has its own cloud called Azure Finance. Every solution comes with its own advantages and disadvantages.""Query optimitzer could be simplified.""The scalability and the high availability feature can be expanded or improved. Currently, there is a limitation on scalability. A feature similar to the Oracle Diagnostic feature can be included to provide a better user experience.""CAL licenses should cost less. Microsoft usually prices high for client access licenses. Server plus user client access license (CAL) licensing requires a separate Server license for each server on which the software is installed, plus a user CAL for each user accessing the server."

More SQL Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades."

More SAP IQ Pricing and Cost Advice »

"SQL Server is a cost-effective solution for a small database.""Pricing is reasonable for small organizations, but the scaling increases the price.""We didn't have any licensing costs for SQL Server.""We pay approximately $12,000 USD per month for both the server and the license.""The price could be cheaper.""Cost is a major derivative for any organization. It has a reasonable cost value, and its cloud support is also better than others. Comparatively, Oracle can do the same things or is even better in certain areas, but it is expensive. The cost along with the support are the plus factors for SQL Server.""We have had to purchase the Enterprise version to the tune of a few hundred thousand dollars, which is just ridiculous.""With recent releases, the Standard Edition (cheaper) SKU has some of the earlier version Enterprise features. SQL Express has some limitations."

More SQL Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution is easy to use and provides similar features to other competitors.
Top Answer: There is a license required for this solution. One of the problems is for smaller businesses to purchases a license because it is expensive for a lot of them to afford.
Top Answer: SQL Server could improve by increase the performance, it cannot handle large amounts of data. I did not find any additional features compared to others solutions.
Ranking
12th
Views
2,085
Comparisons
1,438
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,235
Rating
8.0
1st
Views
20,780
Comparisons
16,213
Reviews
95
Average Words per Review
453
Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Sybase IQ
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
Learn More
Overview

SAPĀ® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SQL Server is the Microsoft-driven relational database management system. This system is used to store data as well as retrieve it when necessary; these functions can be supported by individual users or by multiple users within a larger network. The Microsoft SQL Server has warehousing options, quality and integration services, management tools that are simple to implement, as well as robust tools for development.

Looking at the more technical end of things, Microsoft SQL Server uses query languages such as T-SQL and ANSI SQL. Disaster recovery is one of the product's most prominent features, in addition to in-memory performance, scalability, and corporate business intelligence capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about SAP IQ
Learn more about SQL Server
Sample Customers
ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm67%
Marketing Services Firm11%
Healthcare Company11%
Insurance Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Transportation Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise37%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise72%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, SAP and others in Relational Databases. Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAP IQ is ranked 12th in Relational Databases with 1 review while SQL Server is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 96 reviews. SAP IQ is rated 8.0, while SQL Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "An excellent column-based, enterprise relational database solution with good speed and compression". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Server writes "A stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything". SAP IQ is most compared with Apache Hadoop, SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, SAP HANA, Oracle Database and Oracle Exadata, whereas SQL Server is most compared with SAP HANA, Oracle Database, IBM Db2 Database, Teradata and LocalDB.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.