Compare SAP IQ vs. Teradata

SAP IQ is ranked 8th in Relational Databases with 2 reviews while Teradata is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 12 reviews. SAP IQ is rated 7.0, while Teradata is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP IQ writes "An excellent column-based, enterprise relational database solution with good speed and compression". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teradata writes "Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries". SAP IQ is most compared with SAP Adaptive Server Enterprise, Apache Hadoop and SAP HANA, whereas Teradata is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Exadata and Amazon Redshift. See our SAP IQ vs. Teradata report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAP IQ Logo
4,218 views|3,065 comparisons
Teradata Logo
19,000 views|14,914 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP IQ vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Unbeatable speed and compression with a colummn-structured relational database.

Read more »

The most valuable features are the Shared-nothing architecture and data protection functionality.The feature that we find most valuable is its ability to perform Massive Parallel Processing.It handles large amounts of information with a linear performance increase, in relation to a HW investment.It has a solid set of tools and consulting services.It has massive parallel processing ability to do large amounts of concurrent querying.It has given our business the ability to gain insights into the data and create data labs for analysis and PoCs.Cuts time to process huge amounts of data with efficient analytical queries.A conventional and easily defined way to build a data warehouse or a layer of data marts.

Read more »

Cons
The organization who owns the product does not support it well and appears not to be doing significant development for the future.

Read more »

The user interface needs to be improved.I would like to see an improved Knowledge Base on the web.It needs a teaching web site with more training on third-party tools used for BI.We tried to use case Teradata for a data warehouse system, but we had some problems in relation to the Teradata system, CDC tools, and source databases. We were unable to transfer data from HPE Integrity mainframe to Teradata.There is a need to improve performance in high transaction processes, as well as the reporting system.Query language and its functionality are rather limited, compared to Oracle or even SQL Server. However, it is possible to perform any kind of logic in it (though some workarounds may be required).Data ingestion is done via external utilities and not by the query language itself. It would be more convenient to have that functionality within its SQL dialect.Needs compatibility with more Big Data platforms.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The only costs after standard licensing fees are for add-ons and upgrades.

Read more »

The price needs to be more competitive as Hadoop, Redshift, Snowflake, etc are constantly making way into EDW space.We are looking for a more flexible cost model for the next version that we use, whether it be cloud or on-premise.Price is quite high, so if it is really possible to use other solutions (e.g. you do not have strict requirements for performance and huge data volumes), it might be better to look at alternatives from the RDBMS world.Teradata is expensive but gives value for money, especially if you don't want to move your data to the cloud.It is still a very expensive solution. While I very much like the pure technological supremacy of the software itself, I believe Teradata as a company needs to become more affordable. They are already losing the market to more flexible or cheaper competitors.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
8th
Views
4,218
Comparisons
3,065
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
732
Avg. Rating
7.7
3rd
Views
19,000
Comparisons
14,914
Reviews
12
Average Words per Review
228
Avg. Rating
8.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
Sybase IQ
Learn
SAP
Teradata
Overview

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

Teradata's portfolio of big data analytic solutions, integrated marketing applications, and services help organizations gain a sustainable competitive advantage with data.

Offer
Learn more about SAP IQ
Learn more about Teradata
Sample Customers
ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.Netflix
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm67%
Marketing Services Firm11%
Insurance Company11%
Healthcare Company11%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider43%
Manufacturing Company14%
Logistics Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise74%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business47%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise42%
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP IQ vs. Teradata and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,239 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email