We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and SAS Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"The main benefit is that the solution is low maintenance. Moreover, it's the license cost is very low because it's part of the package. The maintenance is standard maintenance. And the updates are regular. So there's a regular update and you can choose whether you want to do those updates or not."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are its system monitoring and alerts."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."
"SAP needs to improve a lot in terms of the orchestration part so that more adapters can be provided to users, which are areas where the solution has downsides."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"It requires some maintenance."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"It is scalable, but there can be performance issues with high data volume or traffic, especially during month ends."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while SAS Access is ranked 42nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while SAS Access is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and IBM B2B Integrator, whereas SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS, Zapier and Toad Data Point. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SAS Access report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
