We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"SAP Process Orchestration is middleware where we are able to manage and interact with everything from a single location. One of the most beneficial areas is monitoring which is very easy because it is all in one place. There are many adapters added recently that can be used for new functionality. The solution is easy to operate and it is more mature than the cloud solution provided by SAP."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution."
"The OSGI console is available to debug different issues and get low level informations on the applications development, like bundle, dependencies, etc."
"The most valuable part of the solution is the ease-of-use and ease of deployment."
"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."
"Good performance and reliability."
"Customer support is very efficient."
"It is very stable. It is a market leader, and it has connectors to many of the legacy systems. It also has enterprise cloud connectors."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."
"XML to JSON transformations, out-of-the-box, helps to build REST services."
"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
"It requires some maintenance."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."
"The cost has room for improvement."
"Improve Business Studio's stability to further minimize development time."
"Technical support is average. It's not the best."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."
"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."
"Cloud fitness is lacking"
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Confluent and IBM App Connect. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
