We performed a comparison between SAP SuccessFactors Learning and Work.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CYPHER LEARNING, Moodle, Google and others in Learning Management Systems (LMS)."It is a very stable tool. It is the most stable security application."
"The best feature of SAP SuccessFactors Learning for me is the assignment profile. It's a rather specific feature, but this is what comes to mind."
"The analytics and reporting features are very helpful."
"I find the user interface user-friendly compared to the initial application."
"The platform's most valuable feature is personalized learning recommendations."
"The interface is really friendly, and the training embedded in it is very easy to use, explore, and search. The catalog is pretty strong."
"The most valuable feature for us in SAP SuccessFactors is the Performance Management module."
"Some valuable features include assigning various courses to employees based on their groups and roles, as well as providing specialized training for new hires."
"We have found value in Work.com because it gave us a central place for capturing any opportunities-related information, such as client-related information. Additionally, it is a place for storing this information. Anyone in the organization, if it was being updated actively by the people or by the sales team, could have access to it. Once the contact information is there about any client, then it stays there. If you are approaching a client, you are able to check if there's any history. It's a good tool, but it all depends on how disciplined the sales team is in entering the information regularly."
"The application integration between cloud and on-premises storage has been completed. However, there is still room for improvement in integrating EC and SAP applications."
"The initial installation could be a bit easier."
"What needs improvement in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the user interface. The user management and the integration of the whole suite could also be improved. The solution also needs to be modernized because at the moment, it's a little bit outdated. It's old-fashioned, and though it has a data import feature, that's just plain outdated. SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have any cutting-edge features."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have a punch-in and punch-out facility."
"The product's configuration process needs improvement."
"The product needs to improve its escalation system."
"The product must make the integrations more seamless."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's e-learning portal has a very poor interface when compared to Cornerstone or PeopleFluent. It's a very basic interface, but I know that it has a very good foundation."
"I found Work.com a bit clunky. There were too many fields, but maybe that was the design. It could be company-specific to me. There were overlapping fields and sometimes it was confusing."
Earn 20 points
SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 22 reviews while Work.com is ranked 18th in Sales Performance Management. SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.8, while Work.com is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Work.com writes "Centralized management, useful information storage, but can feel clunky". SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Workday, Moodle, Litmos, Cornerstone Learning and Wombat Security Education Platform, whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
