Compare SAP Process Orchestration vs. SnapLogic

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros »

"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop.""SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."

More SnapLogic Pros »

Cons
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons »

"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that.""The support is the most important improvement they could make."

More SnapLogic Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."

More SnapLogic Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.
Top Answer: SAP has decided to move everything to the cloud, which means that we have to invest more. New investments would include things like redevelopment and data transfer. In general, we are not satisfied… more »
Top Answer: The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop.
Top Answer: The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that. I'm not sure if this solution can integrate with Docker, but if it can't they should work to make this… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use the solution for integrating different applications. It's very flexible and we can use it as either a database or just a set of cloud-based applications.
Ranking
Views
5,933
Comparisons
4,663
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
789
Rating
8.0
Views
3,033
Comparisons
2,393
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
614
Rating
7.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process IntegrationDataFlow
Learn
SAP
SnapLogic
Overview
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

It all starts with a multi-tenant HTML5-based Designer, Manager and Monitoring Dashboard that runs in the public cloud. The user experience (UX) focuses on self-service, which means it’s a powerful but approachable enterprise integration architecture – easy to set up and easy to use without compromising the need to manage complex data and process flows. Over 400 pre-built connectors, called Snaps, allow you to connect to just about anything and our elastic execution kernel, called the Snaplex, can run in the cloud and behind the firewall. Customers and partners can build their own Snaps with our SDK and use our APIs to easily embed Snaps and integration flows into other applications and platforms.

Offer
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Learn more about SnapLogic
Sample Customers
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser KompressorenAdobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company25%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company13%
Mining And Metals Company13%
Financial Services Firm13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider7%
Transportation Company7%
Media Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Large Enterprise67%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Seeburger, SAP and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 7 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 6th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 2 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0, while SnapLogic is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Simple to use and scalable but isn't ideal for complex processing". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, SAP Data Services and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Matillion ETL.

See our list of .

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.