Compare SAP Process Orchestration vs. webMethods Integration Server

SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 7 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 7.8, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Offers good integration, data maps, and routing functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server and SAP Data Services, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus and Oracle Service Bus.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SAP Process Orchestration? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.The initial setup is easy.The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.

Read more »

A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging.The MFT component of webMethods, for example, is easy to set up and convenient to use. It handles files very efficiently and it is easy to automate tasks with complex schedules. Monitoring is centralized to MWS which can be used to monitor other products as well (Trading Networks, BPM, MFT, etc.)

Read more »

Cons
It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.

Read more »

The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing for this solution is fine.The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.

Read more »

It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,268
Comparisons
2,898
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
619
Avg. Rating
7.8
3rd
out of 24 in ESB
Views
16,342
Comparisons
11,178
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
335
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
Learn
SAP
Software AG
Overview
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser KompressorenFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company56%
Comms Service Provider9%
Media Company7%
Retailer4%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company20%
Software R&D Company20%
Maritime Company10%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company40%
Comms Service Provider13%
Retailer5%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: March 2020.
407,538 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.