We performed a comparison between SAP SuccessFactors Learning and TalentLMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Learning Management Systems (LMS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is really friendly, and the training embedded in it is very easy to use, explore, and search. The catalog is pretty strong."
"It is a very stable tool. It is the most stable security application."
"The most valuable feature for us in SAP SuccessFactors is the Performance Management module."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning is highly scalable."
"The analytics and reporting features are very helpful."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's most valuable features are accessibility and updated UX. The solution can be accessed from outside of the office network and the user's experience is good."
"Cloud Solution enables accessing the system from the internet, with no need to be within the company network."
"One valuable aspect of SAP SuccessFactors Learning is its stability and established customer base, particularly evident in modules like Employee Central."
"Notifications can to automated to notify users of assigned courses, remind users of outstanding courses, and email PDF certificates upon successful completion."
"It is one of the least expensive learning management systems I've ever worked with."
"The setup for TalentLMS is easier than Cypher LMS."
"The flexibility and user-friendliness of the user's front end can be improved."
"What needs improvement in SAP SuccessFactors Learning is the user interface. The user management and the integration of the whole suite could also be improved. The solution also needs to be modernized because at the moment, it's a little bit outdated. It's old-fashioned, and though it has a data import feature, that's just plain outdated. SAP SuccessFactors Learning doesn't have any cutting-edge features."
"SAP SuccessFactors Learning's e-learning portal has a very poor interface when compared to Cornerstone or PeopleFluent. It's a very basic interface, but I know that it has a very good foundation."
"The solution should have a more user-friendly dashboard because its current dashboard is not so great."
"The consultants implementing this solution could be more knowledgeable."
"The product must make the integrations more seamless."
"The application integration between cloud and on-premises storage has been completed. However, there is still room for improvement in integrating EC and SAP applications."
"The GUI and dashboards are areas in the solution with shortcomings where improvements are required."
"Regarding improvement areas, when I upload animated training packs in Microsoft PowerPoint format, the animation and transitions are lost. This makes it static."
"The built-in builder has some rather serious limitations."
"The problem with TalentLMS is that it has some bugs. If you need to upload an image, then it will cause trouble. It is not actually stable."
SAP SuccessFactors Learning is ranked 4th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 20 reviews while TalentLMS is ranked 9th in Learning Management Systems (LMS) with 3 reviews. SAP SuccessFactors Learning is rated 7.6, while TalentLMS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors Learning writes "An easy-to-deploy and stable solution helpful for multiple HR-related activities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TalentLMS writes "Good automation and dashboards with helpful customer support". SAP SuccessFactors Learning is most compared with Workday, Moodle, SAP Litmos, Cornerstone Learning and CYPHER Learning, whereas TalentLMS is most compared with CYPHER Learning and Moodle. See our SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs. TalentLMS report.
See our list of best Learning Management Systems (LMS) vendors.
We monitor all Learning Management Systems (LMS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.