Saperion vs Software Innovation Public 360 Comparison - Updated 2018

Saperion

Software Innovation Public 360

18255

Saperion

Based on 1 review.

19051

Software Innovation Public 360

Most Helpful Review

Rafał Redel

Software Engineer at a tech services company

I would like to see improvements in the web client and the workflow engine.

The product allowed organizations to move and accelerate their paper-based business flows into electronic ones. The SAP integration is always very... Read more »

Use Software Innovation Public 360? Share your opinion.

Looking for a deeper dive into
Enterprise Content Management?

Enterprise content management report from it central station 2018 05 05 thumbnail

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Quotes From Members Comparing Saperion vs Software Innovation Public 360

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Looking for a deeper dive into Enterprise Content Management? Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report. In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Ranking
RANKING	21st out of 38 In Enterprise Content Management Views 955 Comparisons 582 Reviews 1 Followers 341 Avg. Rating 3.0	29th out of 38 In Enterprise Content Management Views 324 Comparisons 233 Reviews 0 Followers 336 Avg. Rating N/A
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons	Hyland OnBase vs. Saperion Compared 23% of the time. SharePoint vs. Saperion Compared 20% of the time. IBM FileNet vs. Saperion Compared 10% of the time. See more Saperion competitors »	SharePoint vs. Software Innovation Public 360 Compared 28% of the time. DocStar ECM vs. Software Innovation Public 360 Compared 7% of the time. IBM FileNet vs. Software Innovation Public 360 Compared 6% of the time. See more Software Innovation Public 360 competitors »

Also Known As
Also Known As		Public 360
Website/Video
Website/Video	Hyland	Tieto
Overview
Overview	The Saperion Enterprise Content Management platform not only provides immediate access to documents, it also allows them to be managed safely throughout their life cycle. This enables businesses to increase their efficiency and meet compliance requirements faster.	Public 360 is a standardized solution for case, records and archive management. The solution features seamless integration with Microsoft Office and Outlook, facilitating efficient digital administration for collaboration and external communications.
OFFER
Learn more about Saperion Learn More	Learn more about Software Innovation Public 360 Learn More
Sample Customers
Sample Customers	CSL Behring	Avinor, City of Bergen, Cross-County Cooperation, Kung_lv Local Administration, Municipality of Bergen, Omsorgsbygg, Oppland County, Sarpsborg Local Administration,Sarpsborg Municipality, Skien Municipality, Srum Municipality, Statnett, Stockholm City Planning Administration, The Danish Coastal Authority, The Danish Immigration Service, The Danish Parlament, The Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Looking for a deeper dive into
Enterprise Content Management?

Get key insights from the leading enterprise tech professionals in this detailed and easy to navigate report.

In order to provide you with this free report, we may share your details with up to 3 of our partners. By downloading this report, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.