We performed a comparison between SAS Access and Talend Stitch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The most valuable aspect of the solution is the ease of access to the data in those databases."
"The most valuable feature is you have native access to the external databases."
"The most valuable part of SAS/ACCESS is what it is made for: connecting to remote systems that are not part of your physical SAS environment."
"The most valuable feature of Stitch for us is ease of use. This solution is fire-and-forget. All an organization has to do is set up the connection or integration and move on."
"I can't really recall any missing feature or general improvement that is needed. We don't really add too many new kinds of databases and therefore our needs are already met."
"The solution can provide access to the newer databases that come out sooner."
"The pricing model needs to be reconsidered and adjusted."
"Generally speaking, support is a pain point. In the next release, I would love to see a change in support from the current chat to a more comprehensive portal."
SAS Access is ranked 38th in Data Integration with 3 reviews while Talend Stitch is ranked 17th in Cloud Data Integration with 1 review. SAS Access is rated 9.0, while Talend Stitch is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SAS Access writes "The solution is stable, scalable, and flexible". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Talend Stitch writes "Fire-and-forget solution with a great infrastructure". SAS Access is most compared with Delphix, SSIS and Zapier, whereas Talend Stitch is most compared with Talend Open Studio and AWS Glue.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.