• Home
  • SAS Activity-Based Management vs. XLerant

SAS Activity-Based Management vs XLerant comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SAS Logo

SAS Activity-Based Management

Read 5 SAS Activity-Based Management reviews
278 views|197 comparisons
20% willing to recommend
XLerant Logo

XLerant

68 views|41 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS Activity-Based Management and XLerant based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Business Performance Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back.
ABM: * We use ABM as an expense allocation model and it has improve the awareness and accountability of the cost incurred (due to the... Read more →
Use XLerant?
Ranking
19th
out of 41 in Business Performance Management
Views
278
Comparisons
197
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
33rd
out of 41 in Business Performance Management
Views
68
Comparisons
41
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
SAS
XLerant
Video Not Available
Overview
SAS Activity-Based Management is an analytic application that models business processes to determine cost, profitability and drivers. With this solution, organizations can make informed decisions that streamline processes, deliver revenue growth and reduce costs across the organization.
XLerant provides cloud-based budgeting, forecasting and reporting solutions designed with easy to use interfaces that make a complex process accessible for finance teams and budget managers alike. XLerant's software-as-a-service (SaaS) solutions serve small to mid-size enterprises who value collaborative environments as an effective way to engage employees and achieve their strategic objectives.
Sample Customers
Bank of Queensland, Barclays Bank, BioMar, Danske Bank, Danske Spil, DPPS, First Allied
Georgia Municipal Association, John A. Logan College, San Juan College, Northwood University, William James College, Texas Baptists, Bunker Hill Community College, Fisher College, Union County College, Western Governors University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm19%
Computer Software Company17%
Government9%
Insurance Company8%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise19%
Large Enterprise62%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Business Performance Management
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan, Oracle, Jedox and others in Business Performance Management. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAS Activity-Based Management is ranked 19th in Business Performance Management while XLerant is ranked 33rd in Business Performance Management. SAS Activity-Based Management is rated 5.0, while XLerant is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SAS Activity-Based Management writes "OLAP data extraction and export is a valuable feature but the drilling function needs to be brought back". On the other hand, SAS Activity-Based Management is most compared with Oracle Hyperion, whereas XLerant is most compared with .

See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.

We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.