• Home
  • OpenText Deployment Automation vs. SAS rPath [EOL]

OpenText Deployment Automation vs SAS rPath [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Deployment Automation and SAS rPath [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use OpenText Deployment Automation?
Anonymous User
Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake.
I Integrated rBuilder with Jenkins and setup a Continuous Deployment
Ranking
23rd
out of 32 in Release Automation
Views
116
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Release Automation
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Deployment Automation, Serena Deployment Automation
rPath
Learn More
OpenText
SAS
Overview

Deployment Automation enables repeatable, reliable and audit-compliant processes to simplify application deployments, reduce risk and increase the velocity of delivery across all environments of your delivery pipeline. It seamlessly enables deployment pipeline automation, reducing cycle times and providing rapid feedback on build deployments and releases into production. Reusable deployment templates allow reuse of processes and properties, simplifying the setup of new deployment processes. Supporting continuous integration and continuous deployments, Deployment Automation bridges the DevOps divide by simplifying and automating handoffs and deployments across development and operations teams. More information here.

rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.
Sample Customers
GuideStone, TIAA CREF, EatonVance, Gordmans, D&B, Walkers,, Citi, Department of Health and Human Services USA, UBS, DTCC, Bp, Aflc, Ameritrade, Credit Agricole, Telecom Italia, GreatAmerican, Safeway, Allianz, Groupama, Generali Group.
Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

OpenText Deployment Automation is ranked 23rd in Release Automation while SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation. OpenText Deployment Automation is rated 0.0, while SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". OpenText Deployment Automation is most compared with , whereas SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.