SAS rPath [EOL] vs Symantec Server Management Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAS rPath [EOL] and Symantec Server Management Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Release Automation
31st
out of 42 in Server Monitoring
Views
80
Comparisons
69
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
rPath
Symantec Altirs Server Management Suite
Learn More
Overview
rPath is specialized in automating the assembly, provisioning and updating of diverse operating systems and middleware platforms and application stacks throughout enterprises.

Symantec Server Management Suite provides IT administrators with a comprehensive solution for managing physical and virtual servers across a broad array of platforms. The suite provides solutions to provision, control, automate, and monitor servers from a central console. With these tools, organizations gain and maintain control of their servers, reduce service interruptions, and increase uptime. With Server Management Suite, organizations are able to:

  • Manage change with confidence by driving predictable and repeatable day-to-day operations.
  • Make smarter, faster decisions with real-time conclusions that are data-driven.
  • Drive innovation through the adoption of new technologies and implementation of automated processes without adding new tools, people, or methodologies.
Sample Customers
Kaiser Permanente, Local Government Federal Credit Union, Los Angeles County DPSS, Lotte.com Nantes University Hospital Center, National Bank of Greece, National Board of Social Services
Amway (China) Co. Ltd., Barnabas Health, Cabela's Inc., College of Science, Technology, and Applied Arts of Trinidad and Tobago (COSTAATT), Comparex, DHL Hub Leipzig GmbH, GaVI GmbH, Helvetia Versicherungen, Kwizda Holdings GmbH, NASDAQ OMX Group Inc., Ningbo Municipal Yinzhou District No.2 Hospital, Shanghai Pudong International Container Terminals Co. Ltd., Travelport, University of Oxford
Buyer's Guide
Release Automation
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Microsoft, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: March 2024.
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SAS rPath [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Release Automation while Symantec Server Management Suite is ranked 31st in Server Monitoring. SAS rPath [EOL] is rated 5.0, while Symantec Server Management Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SAS rPath [EOL] writes "Be sure of what you want before implementation as it can be costly to correct a mistake". On the other hand, SAS rPath [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Server Management Suite is most compared with MidVision RapidDeploy.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.