Compare SCOM vs. Savision Live Maps
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM." | "This solution allows us to standardize all of the reports for monitoring the network, so it helps a lot for auditing purposes." "This solution satisfies all of the requirements that we need for our Windows-based systems, so if you are using the Windows platform then this is an easy solution." "It takes a lot of the headache out of managing your data centers and software in other places." "The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console." "This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis." "This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring." "This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions." "The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage." |
Cons | |
"Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion." | "I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on." "I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems." "On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically." "The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved." "The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved." "All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved." "It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring." "Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | "Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month." "If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement." "It is more expensive than the competition." "SCOM is part of the System Center suite and I am satisfied with the pricing." "We have an enterprise agreement that includes this product as part of it." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 461 Comparisons 260 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 259 Rating 10.0 | Views 14,385 Comparisons 9,590 Reviews 16 Average Words per Review 652 Rating 7.6 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 3% of the time. | |
Also Known As | |
| Live Maps | System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012 |
Learn | |
| Martello | Microsoft |
Overview | |
| Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre | System Center Operations Manager provides infrastructure monitoring that is flexible and cost-effective, helps ensure the predictable performance and availability of vital applications, and offers comprehensive monitoring for your datacenter and cloud, both private and public. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Savision Live Maps | Learn more about SCOM |
Sample Customers | |
| Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives | Dialog Telekom |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Financial Services Firm21% Retailer12% Healthcare Company9% Government9% Computer Software Company30% Comms Service Provider16% Government10% Financial Services Firm7% |
Company Size | |
No Data Available | Small Business16% Midsize Enterprise27% Large Enterprise56% Small Business5% Midsize Enterprise28% Large Enterprise67% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, BMC and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Savision Live Maps is ranked 21st in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review while SCOM is ranked 1st in Event Monitoring with 16 reviews. Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0, while SCOM is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Best all-around, multi-features single interface, cross-platform monitoring solution for complex environment groupings". Savision Live Maps is most compared with , whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Nagios XI, PRTG Network Monitor and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor.
See our list of .
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.