Compare SCOM vs. Savision Live Maps
Savision Live Maps is ranked 13th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 1 review while SCOM is ranked 1st in Event Monitoring with 10 reviews. Savision Live Maps is rated 10.0, while SCOM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Savision Live Maps writes "Helpful dashboard, and the ElasticSearch feature helps to identify problematic components". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SCOM writes "Best all-around, multi-features single interface, cross-platform monitoring solution for complex environment groupings". Savision Live Maps is most compared with SCOM, Splunk and AppDynamics, whereas SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Dynatrace.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: February 2020. 397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
This helps to centralize multiple monitoring solutions and streamline integration into ITSM. | SCOM has improved our organization by simplifying the monitoring process. The system tells you what the bi-weekly or monthly usage was and that enables us to report this information to the manager. It shows if there was a connectivity issue that needs to be fixed and it's easier to concentrate on what needs to get fixed. System errors, therefore, get fixed faster. The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage. This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions. This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring. This solution helps our application teams by allowing them to drill further into issues and perform a root cause analysis. The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console. It takes a lot of the headache out of managing your data centers and software in other places. This solution satisfies all of the requirements that we need for our Windows-based systems, so if you are using the Windows platform then this is an easy solution. |
Cons | |
Perhaps more focus can be done on the CMDB portion and bi-directional communication to the ITSM system, but this is a small portion. | Then there is also an issue with capacity and limited space. That is something that needs to be improved. Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved. It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring. All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved. The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved. The console feature is very poor, and it would be very good for us if this were improved. On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically. I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
Information Not Available | If you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, then this is part of the agreement. Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs. 397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 411 Comparisons 243 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 259 Avg. Rating 10.0 | Views 17,352 Comparisons 12,345 Reviews 10 Average Words per Review 633 Avg. Rating 7.8 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 50% of the time.  Compared 33% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time. |  Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Live Maps | System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012 |
Learn | |
| Martello | Microsoft |
Overview | |
| Business Service Management Visualization & Grouping Tools for Microsoft System Centre | System Center Operations Manager provides infrastructure monitoring that is flexible and cost-effective, helps ensure the predictable performance and availability of vital applications, and offers comprehensive monitoring for your datacenter and cloud, both private and public. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Savision Live Maps | Learn more about SCOM |
Sample Customers | |
| Municipality of Alphen, Farah Leisure Parks Management LLC, Mail Technology, Austria Card, SMR Automotives | Dialog Telekom |
Top Industries | |
No Data Available | Retailer15% Healthcare Company11% Software R&D Company7% Government7% Software R&D Company29% Comms Service Provider12% Government8% Financial Services Firm6% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Datadog and others in Application Performance Management (APM). Updated: February 2020.
397,408 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Savision Live Maps Reviews, SCOM Reviews, and our list of Best Application Performance Management (APM) Companies.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.