We performed a comparison between SCADAfence and Tenable OT Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Tenable and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security."The network visibility has enhanced operational efficiency."
"It's for securing the vulnerability of the OT solutions they are using. We mitigate those through patch management activities and find vulnerabilities easily with this security solution."
"The product has easy-to-manage features and components."
"The product’s price is its most valuable feature."
"The tool must provide new features similar to Radiflow."
"Tenable OT product is good, but OT security itself is still maturing."
"The solution should provide more features to prevent attacks."
"Tenable.ot's integration with one of the products needs improvement."
SCADAfence is ranked 7th in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 1 review while Tenable OT Security is ranked 3rd in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 3 reviews. SCADAfence is rated 0.0, while Tenable OT Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of SCADAfence writes "Easy to integrate, enhances operational efficiency, and has machine learning capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable OT Security writes "A stable and affordable tool that is useful for identifying attacks in the OT environment". SCADAfence is most compared with Claroty Platform, Nozomi Networks, Dragos and CyberX, whereas Tenable OT Security is most compared with Nozomi Networks, Claroty Platform, Dragos, CyberX and Microsoft Defender for IoT.
See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.
We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
