Compare SCCM vs. ScienceLogic

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
SCCM Logo
Read 27 SCCM reviews.
45,402 views|29,056 comparisons
ScienceLogic Logo
6,141 views|4,513 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This solution helps us by automating the patching of our system.""This has made the management of our environment easier.""This solution has made life easy with respect to patching, compliance, and OSD.""The most valuable features are Remote Connect, SUP, Cloud functionality, Report, Query, and third-party patching.""The most valuable features are application deployment and task-sequenced imaging.""Patching is the main feature because SCCM is made to control the entire environment without manually interpreting. So it is good to use for patching.""Microsoft is being very competitive right now, and they are really investing in a lot of new features to be more competitive in the marketplace.""The initial setup is straightforward and not too complicated."

More SCCM Pros »

"It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers."

More ScienceLogic Pros »

Cons
"This solution should be simpler, and more consistent across modules/sections.""Not everything is readily available, and there are a lot of commands that are only executable via PowerShell.""This solution needs to be supported on all Operating systems.""The cost of the product can be improved.""The operations could be faster and you need some patience with this tool.""The main room for improvement is the on-screen display. I think it would be good if some improvements were made.""We'd like the solution to make it easier to manage remote users.""With Microsoft Premier Support, you get what you pay for. There's Third Tier Support that you pay for. If you pay for that, you get excellent support, and if you don't pay for that, then you get the less experienced staff."

More SCCM Cons »

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose.""When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools.""Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing.""Presently, I am using a free trial version.""We have to pay for a license."

More SCCM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

More ScienceLogic Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: We are happy with the collaboration of SCCM with Patch My PC, which allows us to do patch work.
Top Answer: Pricing is not in my work description and is left up to management and my colleagues.
Top Answer: While the solution is quite good, it can be difficult to understand the logic of this product when it comes to software inventory. Upon examination of the on-premise and Azure environments, I feel… more »
Top Answer: It is very easy to configure because we are using an agent-less version. You can very quickly implement a collector for monitoring device servers.
Top Answer: Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution.
Top Answer: It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with… more »
Ranking
2nd
out of 32 in Server Monitoring
Views
45,402
Comparisons
29,056
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
452
Rating
8.1
11th
out of 32 in Server Monitoring
Views
6,141
Comparisons
4,513
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
325
Rating
10.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
System Center Configuration Manager
Learn More
Overview
With System Center Configuration Manager, you can manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving your employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose.

ScienceLogic is the global leader in hybrid IT monitoring for the network of everything. Over 25,000 global service providers, enterprises, and government organizations rely on ScienceLogic to significantly enhance IT efficiency, optimize operations, and ensure business continuity. ScienceLogic is the first monitoring solution to provide a comprehensive view of all IT components through a single pane of glass, whether they reside in a public cloud environment or on-premises. With over 1,500 dynamic management apps and custom dashboarding capabilities, we deliver the scale, resiliency, and automation needed to simplify the constantly evolving task of managing IT resources, services, and applications.

Offer
Learn more about SCCM
Learn more about ScienceLogic
Sample Customers
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, Dimension Data, Japan Business Systems, St. Lucie County Public Schools, MISC Berhad
Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Computer Software Company15%
Insurance Company10%
Transportation Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider57%
Manufacturing Company14%
Transportation Company14%
Media Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise56%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise80%
REVIEWERS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, Artica Soluciones Tecnologicas and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: May 2021.
511,607 professionals have used our research since 2012.

SCCM is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 27 reviews while ScienceLogic is ranked 11th in Server Monitoring with 1 review. SCCM is rated 8.2, while ScienceLogic is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScienceLogic writes "It is stable and very easy to configure". SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and ManageEngine Desktop Central, whereas ScienceLogic is most compared with LogicMonitor, Dynatrace, Splunk, Datadog and SolarWinds NPM.

See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.