OmidKoushkiSolution Architect at KIAN company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
"Presently, I am using a free trial version."
"We have to pay for a license."
Earn 20 points
It auto-discovers and collects communication data such as receive and transmit rates in aggregate and segmented by port. It enables you to: View your complete infrastructure as a dynamic network map. Perform network performance monitoring with real-time receive and transmit rates and ports used for communication.
SCCM is ranked 2nd in Server Monitoring with 27 reviews while Sematext Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 29th in Server Monitoring. SCCM is rated 8.0, while Sematext Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". On the other hand, SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and ManageEngine Desktop Central, whereas Sematext Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with .
See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.