![]() | OmidKoushki Network Specialist at KIAN company |
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for."
"Pricing is negotiable with Microsoft, depending upon which of their packages you choose."
"When you compare this solution with other tools in the market you might actually find a lot of variation in the pricing and that's why people opt for the other tools rather than Microsoft tools."
"Its price is okay because it is part of our licensing."
SolarWinds Patch Manager makes it easy to perform 3rd-party patch management across tens of thousands of servers and workstations, and enables you to leverage and extend the capabilities of Microsoft WSUS or SCCM to report, deploy, and manage 3rd-party patches as well as Microsoft patches.
SCCM is ranked 1st in Patch Management with 20 reviews while SolarWinds Patch Manager is ranked 10th in Patch Management. SCCM is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds Patch Manager is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SCCM writes "Works well with Windows, very stable, and can scale well". On the other hand, SCCM is most compared with Ansible, BigFix, Quest KACE Systems Management, Ivanti Patch for Windows and Chef, whereas SolarWinds Patch Manager is most compared with Ivanti Patch for SCCM, Ivanti Patch for Windows, GFI LanGuard, Quest KACE Systems Management and BigFix.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.