SCOM vs. SiteScope

SCOM is ranked 3rd in Event Monitoring with 3 reviews vs SiteScope which is ranked 14th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "It’s complex and powerful giving the ability to monitor websites better". The top reviewer of SiteScope writes "The GUI is cumbersome, and it requires a Java client". SCOM is most compared with Nagios XI, Zabbix and PRTG. SiteScope is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and SCOM. See our SCOM vs. SiteScope report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. SiteScope and others in Event Monitoring.
302,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SCOM vs. SiteScope

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It can send messages to our ticketing system.It has good graphs of what is going on within the operating system.​We are able to do problem determination on runaway processes.It works better than other products I’ve used – namely SolarWinds, which is cumbersome and error prone for web app monitoring. SCOM is not.The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring.

Read more »

SiteScope has built-in flat file DB, hence it removes the dependency of an external DB for higher stability.Has a simple setup. It can be up and running within hours.It can monitor over a 100 technologies with built-in solution templates.The Monitor Templates functionality allowed us to spin up monitoring with .csv files pretty easily.Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good.Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored.

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
​I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes.​Non Windows monitoring is fairly weak. Network device monitoring is not reliable.It could use some system enhancements, such as better dashboards.

Read more »

Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS.They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files.They should provide more templates for new vendor devices.It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The pricing and licensing are fair.

Read more »

SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing.You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
302,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
35,071
Comparisons
16,333
Reviews
4
Followers
1,143
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
7,572
Comparisons
2,476
Reviews
4
Followers
330
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
See more SCOM competitors »
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more SiteScope competitors »
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
System Center Operations Manager, SCOM 2012Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope
Website/Video
Microsoft
Micro Focus
Null Vendor
Overview
System Center Operations Manager provides infrastructure monitoring that is flexible and cost-effective, helps ensure the predictable performance and availability of vital applications, and offers comprehensive monitoring for your datacenter and cloud, both private and public.SiteScope is an agentless application monitoring software that provides heterogeneous and hybrid support, quick time to value, and ease of installation, configuration, and use.
Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about SCOM
Learn more about SiteScope
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Dialog TelekomVodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer
22%
Healthcare Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Cloud Provider
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Retailer
8%
University
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
32%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Transportation Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
10%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
60%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
36%
Midsize Enterprise
9%
Large Enterprise
55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
22%
Midsize Enterprise
13%
Large Enterprise
65%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SCOM vs. SiteScope and others in Event Monitoring.
Download now
302,095 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email