We performed a comparison between SCOM and Statseeker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The solution has improved our overrides and the ability to start services if they're stopped."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"The solution is scalable. If you want to monitor more you have to buy more licenses, but you can add on. We don't plan to increase usage."
"This is a product that does more generally than any of the competing solutions."
"The most valuable feature of SCOM is the capability of using classes within your management pack development."
"The most valuable features in SCOM are Azure monitoring and integration with Azure Monitor for monitoring Azure-hosted servers from SCOM on-premises."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"SCOM has improved our organization by simplifying the monitoring process. The system tells you what the bi-weekly or monthly usage was and that enables us to report this information to the manager. It shows if there was a connectivity issue that needs to be fixed and it's easier to concentrate on what needs to get fixed. System errors, therefore, get fixed faster."
"The most valuable feature is the dashboard, where you have everything right there on the screen."
"The monitoring provided by this solution helps us to track down and solve issues."
"It is fairly simple and easy to use as an all-purpose network monitor."
"The product simplifies monitoring by providing real-time alerts through a GUI dashboard, email and texts."
"Device grouping is very easy, and you can discover thousands of devices in a few minutes."
"Statseeker helps to quickly see if you have a spike or something going on. In the future, we need to get NetFlow in the tool so we can see what the IP is."
"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."
"I like the fact that I can aggregate multiple interfaces into a single graph. It allows me to quickly the summary of traffic for multiple devices which is helpful."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."
"Regarding certain issues in the solution, it can be difficult to generate reports if we have a program that is not user-friendly for reporting. While this is not necessarily negative, we may need to use another solution."
"System Center just provided upgrade and update features for Windows clients, and Windows systems, and did not support Linux, Android, or iOS, and other operating systems. They need to provide better integration with other operating systems if they don't already."
"Stability and some performance issues exist and they need improvement."
"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."
"In terms of features that could be improved, I would say the agent integration into the operating system. We are having difficulties integrating Linux into some of the networking devices."
"On-prem network monitoring is something that could be improved drastically."
"It'll help if they can provide real-time or closer to real-time monitoring."
"The user interface needs a great deal of improvement."
"More private MIB object support, such as WAN optimisation performance and wireless, would be helpful."
"Detailed data can be hard to extract in CSV form. Sometimes, being able to dump down raw data would be good so various time periods across a longer period could be analysed. At present, data can be presented within Statseeker, but there is lots of "white space" between data points."
"I would like the ability to update the dashboard. I would also like the ability to access via an API. Then I could produce a dashboard that my C level can understand. This is just so they can go and refresh whenever they want to and see what things look like."
"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."
"I would like to see some layer two and layer three topology mappings, similar to what NNMi and SolarWinds presents."
"I would like to see the solution incorporate diagnosis of the workstation."
"It could use more features on Netflow analyser, such as time series graphs and a single network export UDP port and UDP forwarding."
SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 77 reviews while Statseeker is ranked 64th in Network Monitoring Software with 38 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while Statseeker is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Statseeker writes "Simplifies monitoring and provides real-time alerts for issues we might not immediately be aware of otherwise". SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and Nagios XI, whereas Statseeker is most compared with Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.