We performed a comparison between SCOM and Versa Director based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Because it's Windows-based, it actually reports quite well. It reports everything you can think of on the Windows server and allows you to monitor anything. It's excellent for those in the Windows world as it's very good at it."
"It is a user-friendly product that requires almost no maintenance."
"The solution's reporting engine has given me detailed information on which applications or services I've either failed or about to fail in terms of the predictive makeup on Azure cloud."
"Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications."
"This solution saves us a lot of work because it reduces the effort that is required in order to start monitoring."
"Being able to make and customize management packs and send out notifications is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring of Windows and Linux servers."
"SCOM's most valuable features are the network path feature, reporting, and integration with business intelligence."
"The most valuable feature of Versa Director is analytics."
"The most valuable functionality is some of the policy pieces that are quite useful."
"Versa Director's best feature is the ease of configuration and customer and vendor management."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The solution should be more user-friendly and offer a better user interface."
"System Center just provided upgrade and update features for Windows clients, and Windows systems, and did not support Linux, Android, or iOS, and other operating systems. They need to provide better integration with other operating systems if they don't already."
"The initial setup should be easier to complete."
"There are some negative points about this product. Sometimes, the capabilities of the software don't appear, and you can't directly see the results. You have to wait for a long period to refresh the policy to push it to the software or other patches."
"I would like to see more standard libraries for the market solutions, out of the box, that you don't need to do a lot of work on."
"Application monitoring must be improved."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"It lacks certain details that other products do better, like granular access and better application monitoring."
"It requires some simplification."
"What needs improvement in Versa Director is maturity because, from an operating point of view, it's not mature enough. You'll still need to do a lot of research on Versa Director, so if it could mature faster, that would be very good."
"Versa Director's deployment process is not the best."
SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 76 reviews while Versa Director is ranked 58th in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while Versa Director is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Versa Director writes "User-friendly and simpler than its competitors". SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, ManageEngine OpManager and AppDynamics, whereas Versa Director is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, ThousandEyes, Zabbix and PRTG Network Monitor. See our SCOM vs. Versa Director report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.