Compare SecurEnvoy SecurICE vs. Starling Two-Factor Authentication
Views
80
Comparisons
64
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
45
Comparisons
28
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SecurICE
Starling Two Factor Authentication
SecurIce provides clients with the ability to turn on robust, multi-factor authentication for users in the event of an emergency. The userâs existing standard password is the first factor, and a passcode sent to the userâs mobile phone is the second. There is no need for the user to enrol and remember an additional PIN, and no need for extra tokens or smartcards - the ideal, emergency two-factor authentication system.
With Starling Two-Factor Authentication, a SaaS-based solution, you can secure your organization and keep users productive. It solves the password problem without the capital costs or increased infrastructure management often incurred with traditional on-premises solutions.
Learn more about SecurEnvoy SecurICE
Learn more about Starling Two-Factor Authentication
T-Mobile
Akima
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2021.
475,291 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SecurEnvoy SecurICE is ranked 33rd in Authentication Systems while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is ranked 48th in Authentication Systems. SecurEnvoy SecurICE is rated 0.0, while Starling Two-Factor Authentication is rated 0.0. On the other hand, SecurEnvoy SecurICE is most compared with , whereas Starling Two-Factor Authentication is most compared with .
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.