Compare SecureTrust Network Access Control vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SecureTrust Network Access Control? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: August 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The user interface makes it easy to configure and use.
Top Answer: The pricing is okay, but the cost of scaling can be expensive if a company must buy more devices.
Top Answer: This solution needs to including machine learning and AI functionality to assist with intrusion prevention. In Indonesia, there are a lot of false positives. For example, many websites from our… more »
Ranking
15th
Views
120
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
6th
Views
1,422
Comparisons
856
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
400
Avg. Rating
8.3
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Trustwave Network Access Control
Learn
Trustwave
Sophos
Overview

Through market-leading and patented technologies, Trustwave NAC enables granular control over network access and continuous monitoring of corporate-sanctioned and bring-your-own-device (BYOD) endpoints. This can help you to prevent the spread of malware and other threats that can harm infrastructure and leave your business vulnerable to attack and data loss.

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.
Offer
Learn more about SecureTrust Network Access Control
Learn more about Sophos Network Access Control
Sample Customers
Magnolia HotelsRushmoor Borough Council
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government10%
Media Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: August 2020.
437,208 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SecureTrust Network Access Control is ranked 15th in Network Access Control while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 6th in Network Access Control with 5 reviews. SecureTrust Network Access Control is rated 0.0, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "Integrates endpoints and firewall: Endpoints missing a patch will be disconnected from the network". SecureTrust Network Access Control is most compared with , whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ExtremeControl, Fortinet FortiNAC and Portnox CORE.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.