Compare Securonix Security Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Security Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The feature that is most valuable is the fact that it's an open platform, so it allows us to modify policies and tune policies as needed. There's also a feature called Data Insights which allows us to create different dashboards on specific things of interest for us.""The machine-learning algorithms are the most valuable feature because they're able to identify the 'needle in the haystack.'""When we were looking for products for our security monitoring needs, our biggest requirement was that we wanted something based on machine-learning and analytics. If you go with rules, it can raise a lot of noise. Securonix, with its UEBA capability, had the best analytics use-cases.""One of the most valuable features it has is the thread chaining. One of the common issues that we always had was the number of anomalies that we used to get and the number of alerts that we used to get. But with this approach of thread chaining, we've found the false-positive rate has decreased very significantly. That was something that we never could have achieved before.""The most valuable feature is being able to look at users' behavioral profiles to see what they typically access. One of the key events that we monitor is people's downloading of objects... It's very easy to see people's patterns, what they typically do.""[The solution has] incident-management or case-management functionality. If someone were to download a high number and we decided we needed to investigate it, I could open a case right in the tool. It would be able to directly reference the data that they downloaded and we could open and shut the case directly in the tool, as well as report from it.""The feature that I have found most valuable is their analytics platform where they have the open security data-link, which they introduced. This is typically different from the other vendors.""I was looking for software as a service rather than having issues with managing hardware, upgrades, updates. I was trying to step away from that. Those were the key factors when looking at Securonix as a full-feature SIEM with next-generation capabilities available."

More Securonix Security Analytics Pros »

"It's straightforward in terms of configuration and troubleshooting and log management and monitoring as well. These are the edge points in addition to it being a modular solution where you can capitalize on your current licenses with extra licensing models, which can match the customer's business requirement and it can help the customer to design or to actually plan for their own roadmap.""The solution is extremely scalable. Our customers are regularly scaling up after installing Splunk.""The most valuable features are the indexing and powerful search features.""The solution is definitely scalable.""This intelligent user behavior analytics package is easy to configure and use while remaining feature filled.""The product is at the forefront of auto-remediation networking. It's great.""This is a good security product."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pros »

Cons
"Securonix implements risk scores based on different policies that are triggered. We've seen some challenges with the risk scores and how they trigger. These are things that Securonix has recognized and they've been working with us to help improve things.""There is room for improvement in the product's integration with ServiceNow and in the reporting features.""We have compliance needs. We have investigation needs. And we have situations where an analyst needs to look at threats. These three things require a different view of how they look at the threats. What would be good is to have Securonix create three different views of their Security Command Center so that, depending on the persona of the person logging in, they'd get the relevant data they need and not see everything.""One of the things they can improve on a little bit is the usability side, to make some things simpler... The tool does have a lot of knobs, you can turn a lot of things on and off and you can change things. Sometimes, it can become a little overwhelming. They should remove some confirmation options and make it simpler for the less mature customers and people who are still trying to grasp it.""We have a lot of users who, because they're engineers and they're bringing down product data - where, at times, a top-level product could be 10,000 or 15,000 objects - it's difficult for us to determine what should be a concern and what shouldn't be a concern. We work with the Securonix folks to try to come up with better ways to identify that.""The pricing. I'm not sure how they are proceeding with the identity based pricing compared with DB pricing which most of the vendors are using today.""There is slight room for improvement in terms of the initial deployment. What I see is that Securonix is more focused on their product. They are expanding, in a big way, the number of customers. So there has to be a number of dedicated teams to jump on and speed up the deployment process.""Some of the user experience when doing threat-hunting, such as being able to see multiple types of analytics from different log sources in one view, would be beneficial. Right now, there are some limitations around that."

More Securonix Security Analytics Cons »

"The solution is much more expensive than relative competitors like ArcSight or LogRhythm. It makes it hard to sell to customers sometimes.""They should work to add more built-in correlation searches and more use cases based on worldwide customer experiences. They need more ready-made use cases.""The correlation engine should have persistent and definable rules.""In the future I would like to see simplified statistics and analytical threats.""The ability to do more complicated data investigation would be a welcome addition for pros, though the functionality now gives most people what they need.""Currently, a lot of network operations need improvement. We still need people to handle incidents. Our vision is to leverage status and convert it directly from the network devices. It would be ideal if we could take action using APIs and API code and remove manual processes.""The price of Splunk UBA is too high."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"A good thing about Securonix is that they don't charge by volume of data or number of devices... They charge by the number of employees, which is a much more predictable number for me, versus data. Our costs are in the $100,000 range over a three-year subscription.""We have a license from our 5.0, so that license just continued. We paid them the extra cloud-hosting costs for a year which were about $300,000.""We went in on a three-year agreement which has an annual licensing fee, based upon the number of people that we're monitoring. There have not been any additional costs to the standard licensing fees."

More Securonix Security Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The licensing costs is around 10,000 dollars.""Pricing varies based on the packages you choose and the volume of your usage."

More Splunk User Behavior Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to… more »
Top Answer: There aren't any positive aspects of the solution. It was a complete failure. There are no redeeming features.
Top Answer: We did not pay a licensing fee. We moved away from the solution.
Top Answer: The solution isn't overly expensive. It's quite affordable. It's not the priciest option on the market. I'm not sure of the exact cost as its not an aspect of the solution I directly deal with.
Ranking
Views
10,162
Comparisons
4,356
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
1,502
Rating
8.2
Views
8,325
Comparisons
5,749
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
8.1
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Securonix
Caspida, Splunk UBA
Learn More
Overview

SNYPR is a next-generation security analytics platform that transforms big data into actionable security intelligence. Built on a Hadoop big data security lake, SNYPR combines an open data model, log management, security incident and event management (SIEM), user and entity behavior analytics (UEBA) and fraud detection into a complete, end-to-end platform that can be deployed in its entirety or in flexible, modular components.

Splunk User Behavior Analytics is a behavior-based threat detection is based on machine learning methodologies that require no signatures or human analysis, enabling multi-entity behavior profiling and peer group analytics – for users, devices, service accounts and applications. It detects insider threats and external attacks using out-of-the-box purpose-built that helps organizations find known, unknown and hidden threats, but extensible unsupervised machine learning (ML) algorithms, provides context around the threat via ML driven anomaly correlation and visual mapping of stitched anomalies over various phases of the attack lifecycle (Kill-Chain View). It uses a data science driven approach that produces actionable results with risk ratings and supporting evidence that increases SOC efficiency and supports bi-directional integration with Splunk Enterprise for data ingestion and correlation and with Splunk Enterprise Security for incident scoping, workflow management and automated response. The result is automated, accurate threat and anomaly detection.
Offer
Learn more about Securonix Security Analytics
Learn more about Splunk User Behavior Analytics
Sample Customers
Dtex SystemsPfizerWestern UnionHarrisITG
8 Securities, AAA Western, AdvancedMD, Amaya, Cerner Corporation, CJ O Shopping, CloudShare, Crossroads Foundation, 7-Eleven Indonesia
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm57%
Insurance Company14%
Government14%
Security Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider20%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise36%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Security Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Securonix Security Analytics is ranked 2nd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 10 reviews while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is ranked 3rd in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 7 reviews. Securonix Security Analytics is rated 8.2, while Splunk User Behavior Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Securonix Security Analytics writes "Behavioral profiles help us identify somebody who is engaging in anomalous behavior". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk User Behavior Analytics writes "Easy to configure and easy to use solution that integrates with many applications and scripts ". Securonix Security Analytics is most compared with Splunk, Exabeam Fusion SIEM, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and ELK Logstash, whereas Splunk User Behavior Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Stealthwatch, Exabeam Fusion SIEM, ELK Elasticsearch and Cisco Sourcefire SNORT. See our Securonix Security Analytics vs. Splunk User Behavior Analytics report.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.