SEEBURGER BIS vs. SWIFTnet FIN

SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 4th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 11 reviews vs SWIFTnet FIN which is ranked 13th in Business-to-Business Middleware. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Very powerful mapping tool that handles all our EDI requirements". SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB and webMethods Trading Networks. SWIFTnet FIN is most compared with SWIFT InterAct and Mule ESB.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SWIFTnet FIN? Share your opinion.
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing SEEBURGER BIS vs. SWIFTnet FIN

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
It's highly scalable, but at a cost. ´╗┐Financially, it costs a lot of money to scale it. If you're having to deploy many implementations of the product, then you get into licensing costs. From a technology perspective, it's highly scalable.The pricing is outrageously, super expensive. Everybody has to earn a living, but it is exorbitant. This is a challenge for us because we have to justify the cost.It costs you half a million dollars to install it, and that's a lot of money.I did a review of other options out there, as we moved into the future and our SAP implementation, that this would be the right solution. It was very comparable to other manage services out there. Thus, there wasn't any clear-cut reason to go in another direction.The pricing and licensing is very competitive.The pricing is not expensive and the licensing is fine. We pay for licenses and support yearly.The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard.

Read more »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,340
Comparisons
1,111
Reviews
8
Followers
191
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
656
Comparisons
447
Reviews
0
Followers
108
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
See more SEEBURGER BIS competitors »
Compared 94% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
See more SWIFTnet FIN competitors »
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Website/Video
Seeburger
SWIFT
Null Vendor
Overview

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

FIN value-added processing includes:

  • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
  • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
  • Message storage and retrieval.

It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about SWIFTnet FIN
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, CofrescoAlcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company
43%
Manufacturing Company
29%
Pharma/Biotech Company
14%
Construction Company
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
18%
Transportation Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
18%
Logistics Company
16%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Avada Software, MuleSoft and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
Download now
300,656 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email