SEEBURGER BIS vs. Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure Comparison

SEEBURGER BIS

Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure

SEEBURGER BIS

Read 14 SEEBURGER BIS reviews.

6,874 views|2,102 comparisons

Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure

13 views|10 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Richard Lehane

Head of IT at a pharma/biotech company

Removes complexity through automation creating efficiencies around time and cost

What would have been a manual process of transmitting data items around between us and third-parties has been automated. SEEBURGER BIS handles the... Read more »

Use Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure? Share your opinion.

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want...""Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run.""Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle.""We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable.""The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license...""We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them.""There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour.""We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box."

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,962 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about SEEBURGER BIS? Top Answer: If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen,"… more » Read all 18 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER BIS? Top Answer: The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if… more » Read all 18 answers What needs improvement with SEEBURGER BIS? Top Answer: For the area that we've used them for so far, I don't really see any way that they can make it easier. I can't say enough about how they have delivered exactly what they said that they would, and for… more » Read all 16 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Ranking
1st out of 42 in Managed File Transfer Views 6,874 Comparisons 2,102 Reviews 16 Average Words per Review 1,981 Rating 8.4	38th out of 42 in Managed File Transfer Views 13 Comparisons 10 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A
Popular Comparisons
IBM B2B Integrator vs. SEEBURGER BIS Compared 18% of the time. Mule ESB vs. SEEBURGER BIS Compared 18% of the time. IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs. SEEBURGER BIS Compared 7% of the time. SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER BIS Compared 6% of the time. OpenText Trading Grid vs. SEEBURGER BIS Compared 5% of the time. See more SEEBURGER BIS competitors » + Add more products to compare	See more Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
Seeburger	Thorn Technologies Video Not Available
Overview
The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges: B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners. API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time. Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.	SFTP Gateway for Azure lets you easily and securely upload your files to Azure Blob Storage via SFTP.
Offer
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS Learn More	Learn more about Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure Learn More
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco	Cartera Commerce, Sprint, NOKIA
Top Industries
REVIEWERS Retailer27% Transportation Company19% Manufacturing Company15% Pharma/Biotech Company12% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company41% Comms Service Provider10% Financial Services Firm6% Retailer5%	No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS Small Business3% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise81%	No Data Available

SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Managed File Transfer with 14 reviews while Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure is ranked 38th in Managed File Transfer. SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.6, while Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". On the other hand, SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, SAP Process Orchestration and OpenText Trading Grid, whereas Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare SEEBURGER BIS vs. Thorn SFTP Gateway for Azure