Compare SEEBURGER BIS vs. webMethods ActiveTransfer

SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 1st in Managed File Transfer with 19 reviews while webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 31st in Managed File Transfer. SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.2, while webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 0. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". On the other hand, SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB and IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, whereas webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use webMethods ActiveTransfer? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Sterling File Gateway vs. SEEBURGER BIS and other solutions. Updated: May 2020.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business.On an annual basis, our support costs, which are based on the licensing, are about £120,000.We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box.There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour.We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them.The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license...Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle.We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer solutions are best for your needs.
419,794 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
Views
5,790
Comparisons
1,821
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
1,641
Avg. Rating
8.3
31st
Views
6
Comparisons
5
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration Suite
Learn
Seeburger
Software AG
Overview

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
Imagine the simplicity of having a centralized console to easily manage partner files throughout your organization. That’s what you can do with webMethods ActiveTransfer for Managed File Transfer (MFT).

Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can:

-Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
-Centrally manage file transfers, set up transfer schedules and configure users
-Move large files quickly over long distances to increase partner response time
-Securely exchange files with partners using the latest security and encryption techniques
-Accelerate large file transfers by boosting performance 10 to 25 times, overcoming network
latency and boosting productivity
-Control transfer speeds and allocate necessary, network bandwidth to partners
-Ensure acceptance of file transfers from approved IP addresses and assigned users
-Schedule and create event-driven transfers
-Trigger file transfers as the events occurs, such as completion of a batch job

Offer
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about webMethods ActiveTransfer
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer21%
Transportation Company21%
Pharma/Biotech Company16%
Logistics Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company41%
Retailer9%
Non Profit8%
Comms Service Provider6%
No Data Available
We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.