Compare SEEBURGER BIS vs. webMethods Microgateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use webMethods Microgateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Seeburger, Microsoft and others in API Management. Updated: August 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"On an annual basis, our support costs, which are based on the licensing, are about £120,000.""The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if you're not utilizing all of that then they should consider a lower tier. That way, they could attract more business.""We pay maintenance of between $75,000 and $100,000 per year, per box.""There is a standard agreement for the messaging every month. But if we make a change request — a change to a mapping or something like that — then there is a fixed price per hour.""We pay per message we use. We spend about £19,000 a year with them.""The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license...""Our licensing model is based on transactions. We have a base service contract which is priced against a volume of transactions and another volume of individual transactions, which are covered by one service agreement. Then, we have development services on top of that. Our annual spend is around £80,000. It's about mid-priced, as there are some cheaper alternatives out there and some more expensive ones. It's neither cheap nor expensive. It's somewhere in the middle.""We have additional ad hoc development costs, but those vary depending on if we're bringing on another third-party into our systems via the EDI integration. So, that's highly variable."

More SEEBURGER BIS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: If SEEBURGER plans to do something, they will meet their target. We haven't been disappointed by them at all. For example, we had six trading partners to onboard and they said, "We'll make it happen,"… more »
Top Answer: The only thing that would be an improvement would be if they had a cost model whereby you could just pay for what you're actually using. Even if it were a minimum monthly charge that they offered, if… more »
Top Answer: For the area that we've used them for so far, I don't really see any way that they can make it easier. I can't say enough about how they have delivered exactly what they said that they would, and for… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 39 in API Management
Views
6,510
Comparisons
1,976
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
1,644
Avg. Rating
8.3
30th
out of 39 in API Management
Views
37
Comparisons
33
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Also Known As
Seeburger Business Integration SuitewebMethods API Microgateway
Learn
Seeburger
Software AG
Overview

The SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) is a central platform for all integration activities. It enables you to respond easily, rapidly and innovatively to your digital transformation challenges:

  • B2B integration: Network and integrate your company with any or all of your business partners.

  • API integration and API management: Establish a framework for networking all of your systems across companies in real-time.

  • Managed File Transfer (MFT) integration: Use secure and simple mechanisms for standardized intra- and cross-company data exchange processes and data integration.

Rapid development, rapid deployment. Continuous delivery, continuous integration. Today’s shorter innovation cycles are driving the demand for scalable microservices built around business capabilities. Now you can secure API access to those microservices easily without worry using Software AG’s API microgateway.

Designed to sit closer to business logic and protect it, webMethods Microgateway is independent—lightweight, agile and fast—and works with webMethods API Gateway or as a standalone solution to control API access to microservices in a distributed environment.

Highly efficient, the microgateway uses a very small footprint, and it’s fast to deploy. Gain the freedom you need to quickly innovate—choose from multiple form factors (standalone applications and Docker® container) and different deployment options. Support east-west traffic while preventing overloading main gateways.

Offer
Learn more about SEEBURGER BIS
Learn more about webMethods Microgateway
Sample Customers
Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, CofrescoKiabi
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company25%
Retailer20%
Pharma/Biotech Company15%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Non Profit8%
Retailer6%
Wholesaler/Distributor6%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Seeburger, Microsoft and others in API Management. Updated: August 2020.
438,360 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SEEBURGER BIS is ranked 2nd in API Management with 20 reviews while webMethods Microgateway is ranked 30th in API Management. SEEBURGER BIS is rated 8.4, while webMethods Microgateway is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of SEEBURGER BIS writes "Enables any-to-any transformation from one data format to another". On the other hand, SEEBURGER BIS is most compared with IBM B2B Integrator, Mule ESB, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, OpenText Trading Grid and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas webMethods Microgateway is most compared with .

See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.