We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."It facilitates collaboration and the ability to create custom workflows."
"It offers ease of use, which is crucial."
"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"The security feature is valuable."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"Our staff found it simpler, as they did not have to work within a classification system."
"The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The entire product is good."
"The overall functions are good."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"More hints and make it more user-customizable."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement."
"Workflow is something that can become more intelligent."
"Needs improvement on the user interface."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. SharePoint is rated 7.8, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack and Drupal.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
